WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Seahorse Bioscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stollberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stollberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, S. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 10, 247-255, Copyright © 1990 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Local accumulation of acetylcholine receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient to induce cluster formation

J Stollberg and SE Fraser
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine 92717.

Acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) accumulate at developing neuromuscular junctions in part via lateral migration of diffusely expressed receptors. Using a model system--cultured Xenopus muscle cells exposed to electric fields--we have shown that AChRs, concentrated at the cathode-facing cell pole, continue to aggregate there after the field is terminated (Stollberg and Fraser, 1988). These observations are consistent with the possibility that the field-induced increase in receptor concentration triggers the aggregation event. Only 2 other molecular events could initiate the electric field-induced receptor aggregation: (1) a local increase in the density of some other molecules, or (2) a voltage-sensitive mechanism. Treatment of muscle cell cultures with neuraminidase changes the cell surface charge and has been reported to reverse the direction of electromigration for AChRs and concanavalin A binding sites (Orida and Poo, 1978). Using digitally analyzed fluorescence videomicroscopy, we find that AChRs in neuraminidase-treated cultures accumulate at both cell poles in an electric field. After termination of the field, the AChR continues to aggregate at the cathode-facing pole, as in cells not treated with neuraminidase. However, receptor density decreases at the anode-facing pole, indicating that elevated AChR density does not initiate receptor aggregation. Cells pretreated with neuraminidase and trypsin (which blocks receptor aggregation) display reversed receptor distributions compared to untreated controls, indicating that electromigration has indeed been reversed. The rate at which neuraminidase- and trypsin- treated cells approach steady-state distributions indicates a receptor diffusion constant of approximately 1.2 x 10(-9) cm2/sec, consistent with a diffusion trap mechanism of receptor aggregation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-