WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Join the Society for Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, M. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 10, 2528-2540, Copyright © 1990 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Context-dependent responses of primate nucleus basalis neurons in a go/no-go task

RT Richardson and MR DeLong
Departments of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

In previous studies involving monkeys performing behavioral tasks, neurons in the nucleus basalis frequently had significant changes in discharge rate when the animal made a movement in response to a sensory stimulus in order to obtain a reward. To determine whether such responses of basalis neurons are primarily sensory or motor in nature, the activity of single basalis neurons was recorded in monkeys performing a go/no-go (GNG) task which provided a dissociation between sensory and motor neuronal responses. In a sample of 425 basalis neurons, 326 (77%) had significant changes in firing in at least one phase of the GNG task. Most of the task-related neurons (70%) responded in the choice phase in which the animal either made an arm movement (go condition) or kept its arm motionless (no-go condition) in order to obtain a water reward. Of 253 neurons that responded in the choice phase, 88% had changes in firing in the no-go condition that were equal to or, in some cases, greater than the changes in firing in the go condition. Therefore, most responses of basalis neurons in the choice phase could not be specific for the arm movement because they occurred when there was no arm movement at all. The visual stimulus presented in the choice phase was also presented earlier on each trial in the cue phase. Although 70% of the task-related basalis neurons responded in the choice phase, only 5% had detectable changes in firing in the cue phase. Of 251 neurons responding in the cue or choice phase, 59% had significantly larger changes in firing in the choice phase than in the cue phase, whereas only one neuron had a larger response in the cue phase. Therefore, most responses of basalis neurons in the choice phase could not be specific for the visual stimulus because similar responses did not occur when the same stimulus was presented in the cue phase. These results indicate that the frequent responses of basalis neurons in the choice phase are neither purely sensory nor motor in nature, but are highly dependent on the context of the stimulus or movement. The neuronal responses in the choice phase may reflect either transient increases in arousal or decision-making processes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. T. Blake, F. Strata, R. Kempter, and M. M. Merzenich
Experience-Dependent Plasticity in S1 Caused by Noncoincident Inputs
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2239 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. W. Berg, B. Friedman, L. F. Schroeder, and D. Kleinfeld
Activation of Nucleus Basalis Facilitates Cortical Control of a Brain Stem Motor Program
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 699 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Bao, E. F. Chang, J. D. Davis, K. T. Gobeske, and M. M. Merzenich
Progressive Degradation and Subsequent Refinement of Acoustic Representations in the Adult Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., November 26, 2003; 23(34): 10765 - 10775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. T. Blake, F. Strata, A. K. Churchland, and M. M. Merzenich
Neural correlates of instrumental learning in primary auditory cortex
PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 10114 - 10119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Schultz
Predictive Reward Signal of Dopamine Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Acquas, C. Wilson, and H. C. Fibiger
Conditioned and Unconditioned Stimuli Increase Frontal Cortical and Hippocampal Acetylcholine Release: Effects of Novelty, Habituation, and Fear
J. Neurosci., May 1, 1996; 16(9): 3089 - 3096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-