WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zihl, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, C. L., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Zihl, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 11, 454-461, Copyright © 1991 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli

CL Baker Jr, RF Hess and J Zihl
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

A neurological patient (L.M.) suffering a specific loss of visual motion perception (Zihl et al., 1983) due to extrastriate cortical damage was studied using random dot "limited-lifetime" stimuli with a direction discrimination task. With a stimulus like that of Newsome and Pare (1988), the patient exhibited a severe deficit for motion perception, only being able to perform well for very high values of coherence. Different versions of the stimulus were employed to separate out the effects of limited lifetime versus the effects of additive noise as coherence was lowered. When all "signal" dots had a fixed, specified value of lifetime, and varying percentages of "noise" dots were added, the patient showed a profound deficit. In contrast, a stimulus consisting of no noise dots at all, and signal dots having fixed values of lifetime, revealed relatively good performance for surprisingly brief dot lifetimes. Thus, it is the presence of noisy, incoherent dot motion, rather than brief lifetimes, that causes such poor performance on the stimulus of Newsome and Pare (1988). Most surprising was the finding that the presence of even very small percentages of stationary noise dots was sufficient to disrupt totally direction discrimination of moving signal dots. The findings reported here suggest that one major role of extrastriate cortical processing might be the interpretation of stimuli that suffer from an impaired signal-to-noise ratio; the most commonly encountered form of "noise" would presumably be contamination by irrelevant directional spatio- temporal frequency components.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Ellison, A. R. Lane, and T. Schenk
The Interaction of Brain Regions during Visual Search Processing as Revealed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2579 - 2584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
R. D. Hayes and W. H. Merigan
Mechanisms of Sensitivity Loss due to Visual Cortex Lesions in Humans and Macaques
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1117 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. Constantinescu, L. Schmidt, R. Watson, and R. F. Hess
A Residual Deficit for Global Motion Processing after Acuity Recovery in Deprivation Amblyopia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 3008 - 3012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. R. Huxlin and T. Pasternak
Training-induced Recovery of Visual Motion Perception after Extrastriate Cortical Damage in the Adult Cat
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. M. McKendrick, A. J. Vingrys, D. R. Badcock, and J. T. Heywood
Visual Dysfunction between Migraine Events
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2001; 42(3): 626 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. M. Vaina, A. Cowey, R. T. Eskew Jr, M. LeMay, and T. Kemper
Regional cerebral correlates of global motion perception: Evidence from unilateral cerebral brain damage
Brain, February 1, 2001; 124(2): 310 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Moore, H. R. Rodman, and C. G. Gross
Direction of motion discrimination after early lesions of striate cortex (V1) of the macaque monkey
PNAS, December 22, 2000; (2000) 21519698.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. W. Bisley and T. Pasternak
The Multiple Roles of Visual Cortical Areas MT/MST in Remembering the Direction of Visual Motion
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2000; 10(11): 1053 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. W. Greenlee and A. T. Smith
Detection and Discrimination of First- and Second-Order Motion in Patients with Unilateral Brain Damage
J. Neurosci., January 15, 1997; 17(2): 804 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Moore, H. R. Rodman, and C. G. Gross
Direction of motion discrimination after early lesions of striate cortex (V1) of the macaque monkey
PNAS, January 2, 2001; 98(1): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-