Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 11, 454-461, Copyright © 1991 by Society for Neuroscience
Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli
CL Baker Jr, RF Hess and J Zihl
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
A neurological patient (L.M.) suffering a specific loss of visual motion
perception (Zihl et al., 1983) due to extrastriate cortical damage was
studied using random dot "limited-lifetime" stimuli with a direction
discrimination task. With a stimulus like that of Newsome and Pare (1988),
the patient exhibited a severe deficit for motion perception, only being
able to perform well for very high values of coherence. Different versions
of the stimulus were employed to separate out the effects of limited
lifetime versus the effects of additive noise as coherence was lowered.
When all "signal" dots had a fixed, specified value of lifetime, and
varying percentages of "noise" dots were added, the patient showed a
profound deficit. In contrast, a stimulus consisting of no noise dots at
all, and signal dots having fixed values of lifetime, revealed relatively
good performance for surprisingly brief dot lifetimes. Thus, it is the
presence of noisy, incoherent dot motion, rather than brief lifetimes, that
causes such poor performance on the stimulus of Newsome and Pare (1988).
Most surprising was the finding that the presence of even very small
percentages of stationary noise dots was sufficient to disrupt totally
direction discrimination of moving signal dots. The findings reported here
suggest that one major role of extrastriate cortical processing might be
the interpretation of stimuli that suffer from an impaired signal-to-noise
ratio; the most commonly encountered form of "noise" would presumably be
contamination by irrelevant directional spatio- temporal frequency
components.