 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 14, 7367-7380, Copyright © 1994 by Society for Neuroscience
Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology
N Qian and RA Andersen
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.
We investigated how the primate visual system solves the difficult problem
of representing multiple motion vectors in the same part of the visual
space--the problem of motion transparency. In the preceding companion
article we reported that displays with locally well-balanced motion signals
in opposite directions are perceptually nontransparent (i.e., one does not
see two coherent moving surfaces) and that transparent displays always
contain locally unbalanced motion signals. This is exemplified by our
paired and unpaired dot patterns. Although both types of stimuli contain
two sets of dots moving in opposite directions, the former is locally well
balanced and appears like flicker while the latter gives a perception of
two transparent surfaces. In this article we report our physiological
recordings from areas V1 and MT of behaving monkeys, comparing single-cell
responses to the paired and the unpaired dot patterns. Although a small
proportion of directionally selective V1 cells responded differently to the
two types of patterns, the average V1 responses could not reliably
distinguish between the paired and the unpaired stimuli. A large fraction
of MT cells, on the other hand, responded significantly better to the
unpaired dot patterns than to the paired ones. Furthermore, the average
response of all MT cells to the unpaired dot patterns was significantly
higher than that to the paired dot patterns. These results demonstrate a
neural correlate of the perceptual transparency at the level of MT. On the
other hand, V1 cells do not generally discriminate between the transparent
and nontransparent stimuli, indicating that V1 activity is not well
correlated with the perception of motion transparency. Our results are
consistent with a two-stage model for motion processing: the first stage
measures local motion and the second stage introduces suppression if
different directions of motion are present at a local region of the visual
field. The first stage is located primarily in V1 and the second stage
primarily in MT. Finally, we found a strong and negative correlation
between the degree of the opponent-direction suppression of MT cells and
their responses to flicker noise stimuli. This result suggests that one of
the fundamental roles of the opponent-direction suppression in MT is noise
reduction.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Orban
Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2008;
88(1):
59 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ardid, X.-J. Wang, and A. Compte
An Integrated Microcircuit Model of Attentional Processing in the Neocortex
J. Neurosci.,
August 8, 2007;
27(32):
8486 - 8495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kohn
Visual Adaptation: Physiology, Mechanisms, and Functional Benefits
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2007;
97(5):
3155 - 3164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Mysore, R. Vogels, S. E. Raiguel, and G. A. Orban
Processing of Kinetic Boundaries in Macaque V4
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2006;
95(3):
1864 - 1880.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. M. Lorteije, J. L. Kenemans, T. Jellema, R. H. J. van der Lubbe, F. de Heer, and R. J. A. van Wezel
Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas.
J. Cogn. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2006;
18(2):
158 - 168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Pack, B. R. Conway, R. T. Born, and M. S. Livingstone
Spatiotemporal Structure of Nonlinear Subunits in Macaque Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
January 18, 2006;
26(3):
893 - 907.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Krauzlis
Activity of Rostral Superior Colliculus Neurons During Passive and Active Viewing of Motion
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2004;
92(2):
949 - 958.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Thiele, C. Distler, H. Korbmacher, and K.-P. Hoffmann
Contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to direction selectivity and response normalization in macaque middle temporal area
PNAS,
June 29, 2004;
101(26):
9810 - 9815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Menz and R. D. Freeman
Temporal Dynamics of Binocular Disparity Processing in the Central Visual Pathway
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2004;
91(4):
1782 - 1793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.'y. Nishida, Y. Sasaki, I. Murakami, T. Watanabe, and R. B. H. Tootell
Neuroimaging of Direction-Selective Mechanisms for Second-Order Motion
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2003;
90(5):
3242 - 3254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. O. Murray, B. A. Olshausen, and D. L. Woods
Processing Shape, Motion and Three-dimensional Shape-from-motion in the Human Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
May 1, 2003;
13(5):
508 - 516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Grunewald, D. C. Bradley, and R. A. Andersen
Neural Correlates of Structure-from-Motion Perception in Macaque V1 and MT
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 2002;
22(14):
6195 - 6207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Bair, J. R. Cavanaugh, M. A. Smith, and J. A. Movshon
The Timing of Response Onset and Offset in Macaque Visual Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 2002;
22(8):
3189 - 3205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Sugihara, I. Murakami, K. V. Shenoy, R. A. Andersen, and H. Komatsu
Response of MSTd Neurons to Simulated 3D Orientation of Rotating Planes
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2002;
87(1):
273 - 285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Ferrera
Task-Dependent Modulation of the Sensorimotor Transformation for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2000;
84(6):
2725 - 2738.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.L. Paradis, V. Cornilleau-Peres, J. Droulez, P.F. Van de Moortele, E. Lobel, A. Berthoz, D. Le Bihan, and J.B. Poline
Visual Perception of Motion and 3-D Structure from Motion: an fMRI Study
Cereb Cortex,
August 1, 2000;
10(8):
772 - 783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Heeger, G. M. Boynton, J. B. Demb, E. Seidemann, and W. T. Newsome
Motion Opponency in Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
August 15, 1999;
19(16):
7162 - 7174.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Zhang and T. J. Sejnowski
A Theory of Geometric Constraints on Neural Activity for Natural Three-Dimensional Movement
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 1999;
19(8):
3122 - 3145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Seidemann and W. T. Newsome
Effect of Spatial Attention on the Responses of Area MT Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 1999;
81(4):
1783 - 1794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Recanzone, R. H. Wurtz, and U. Schwarz
Responses of MT and MST Neurons to One and Two Moving Objects in the Receptive Field
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 1997;
78(6):
2904 - 2915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Lisberger and V. P. Ferrera
Vector Averaging for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements Initiated by Two Moving Targets in Monkeys
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 1997;
17(19):
7490 - 7502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Ferrera and S. G. Lisberger
Neuronal Responses in Visual Areas MT and MST During Smooth Pursuit Target Selection
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 1997;
78(3):
1433 - 1446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|