WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tole, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tole, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, P. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 15, 970-980, Copyright © 1995 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Regionalization of the developing forebrain: a comparison of FORSE-1, Dlx-2, and BF-1

S Tole and PH Patterson
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125.

The FORSE-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was generated using a strategy designed to produce mAbs against neuronal cell surface antigens that might be regulated by regionally restricted transcription factors in the developing CNS. To determine whether FORSE-1 has a labeling pattern similar to that of known transcription factors, the expression of BF-1 and Dlx-2 was examined by in situ hybridization on sections serial to those labeled with FORSE-1. We find a striking overlap between BF-1 and FORSE-1 in the telencephalon; both are expressed in the lateral but not the medial walls of the telencephalon, and the boundaries of expression are apparently identical. FORSE-1 staining is detected prior to BF-1 expression in the neural tube, however. FORSE-1 and Dlx-2 have very different patterns of expression in the forebrain, suggesting that regulation by Dlx-2 cannot by itself explain the distribution of FORSE- 1. However, they share some sharp boundaries in the diencephalon. In addition, FORSE-1 identifies some previously unknown boundaries in the developing forebrain. These results indicate that a new cell surface marker can be used to subdivide the embryonic telencephalon and diencephalon into regions smaller than previously described, providing necessary complexity to the developmental patterning in the forebrain.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. F. Arboleda-Velasquez, Z. Zhou, H. K. Shin, A. Louvi, H.-H. Kim, S. I. Savitz, J. K. Liao, S. Salomone, C. Ayata, M. A. Moskowitz, et al.
Linking Notch signaling to ischemic stroke
PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4856 - 4861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. T. Kahle, J. Rinehart, P. de los Heros, A. Louvi, P. Meade, N. Vazquez, S. C. Hebert, G. Gamba, I. Gimenez, and R. P. Lifton
WNK3 modulates transport of Cl- in and out of cells: Implications for control of cell volume and neuronal excitability
PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16783 - 16788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
J. Pan, H. Yeger, and E. Cutz
Neuronal Developmental Marker FORSE-1 Identifies a Putative Progenitor of the Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cell Lineage During Lung Development
J. Histochem. Cytochem., December 1, 2002; 50(12): 1567 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F. Polleux, C. Dehay, A. Goffinet, and H. Kennedy
Pre- and Post-mitotic Events Contribute to the Progressive Acquisition of Area-specific Connectional Fate in the Neocortex
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2001; 11(11): 1027 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Tole, G. Goudreau, S. Assimacopoulos, and E. A. Grove
Emx2 Is Required for Growth of the Hippocampus But Not for Hippocampal Field Specification
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2000; 20(7): 2618 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Chung, J. Taylor, D. Shum, and S. Chan
Axon routing at the optic chiasm after enzymatic removal of chondroitin sulfate in mouse embryos
Development, January 6, 2000; 127(12): 2673 - 2683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
E. Grove, S Tole, J Limon, L Yip, and C. Ragsdale
The hem of the embryonic cerebral cortex is defined by the expression of multiple Wnt genes and is compromised in Gli3-deficient mice
Development, January 6, 1998; 125(12): 2315 - 2325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S Tole, C Christian, and E. Grove
Early specification and autonomous development of cortical fields in the mouse hippocampus
Development, January 12, 1997; 124(24): 4959 - 4970.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A Stoykova, R Fritsch, C Walther, and P Gruss
Forebrain patterning defects in Small eye mutant mice
Development, January 11, 1996; 122(11): 3453 - 3465.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
N. Holland, G Panganiban, E. Henyey, and L. Holland
Sequence and developmental expression of AmphiDll, an amphioxus Distal-less gene transcribed in the ectoderm, epidermis and nervous system: insights into evolution of craniate forebrain and neural crest
Development, January 9, 1996; 122(9): 2911 - 2920.
[Abstract] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-