QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (58) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Corneil, B. D. Articles by Munoz, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Corneil, B. D. Articles by Munoz, D. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Volume 16, Number 24, Issue of December 15, 1996 pp. 8193-8207
Copyright ©1996 Society for Neuroscience

The Influence of Auditory and Visual Distractors on Human Orienting Gaze Shifts

Received July 9, 1996; revised Sept. 30, 1996; accepted Oct. 2, 1996.

Brian D. Corneil and Douglas P. Munoz

Medical Research Council Group in Sensory-Motor Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

We studied the influences of competing visual and auditory stimuli on horizontal gaze shifts in humans. Gaze shifts were made to visual or auditory targets in the presence of either an irrelevant visual or auditory cue. Within an experiment, the target and irrelevant cue were either aligned (enhancer condition) or misaligned (distractor condition) in space. The times of presentation of the target and irrelevant cue were varied so that the target could have been presented before the irrelevant cue, or the irrelevant cue before the target. We compared subject performance in the enhancer and distractor conditions, measuring reaction latencies and the frequency of incorrect gaze shifts. Performance differed the most when the irrelevant cue was presented before the target and differed the least when the target was presented before the irrelevant cue. Our results reveal that, in addition to the spatial and temporal register of the stimuli, the experimental context in which the stimuli are presented also influences multisensory integration: an irrelevant auditory cue influenced gaze shifts to visual targets differently than an irrelevant visual cue influenced gaze shifts to auditory targets. Furthermore, we observed patterns of influence unique to either visual or auditory irrelevant cues that occurred regardless of the modality of the target. We believe that subjects adopted a state of motor readiness that reflected the unique demands of target selection in each experiment and that this state modulated the influences of the irrelevant cue on the target.

Key words: human; gaze shifts; visual; auditory; target selection; multisensory integration; visual fixation; motor readiness

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Murthy, S. Ray, S. M. Shorter, J. D. Schall, and K. G. Thompson Neural Control of Visual Search by Frontal Eye Field: Effects of Unexpected Target Displacement on Visual Selection and Saccade Preparation J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2485 - 2506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Edelman and K. Z. Xu Inhibition of Voluntary Saccadic Eye Movement Commands by Abrupt Visual Onsets J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1222 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Stevenson, J. K. Elsley, and B. D. Corneil A "Gap Effect" on Stop Signal Reaction Times in a Human Saccadic Countermanding Task J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 580 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Alvarado, T. R. Stanford, J. W. Vaughan, and B. E. Stein Cortex Mediates Multisensory But Not Unisensory Integration in Superior Colliculus J. Neurosci., November 21, 2007; 27(47): 12775 - 12786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Whitchurch and T. T. Takahashi Combined Auditory and Visual Stimuli Facilitate Head Saccades in the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 730 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Corneil and J. K. Elsley Countermanding Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in Humans: Marching Orders Are Delivered to the Head First J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 883 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Bell, M. A. Meredith, A. J. Van Opstal, and D. P. Munoz Crossmodal Integration in the Primate Superior Colliculus Underlying the Preparation and Initiation of Saccadic Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3659 - 3673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Perrault Jr., J. W. Vaughan, B. E. Stein, and M. T. Wallace Neuron-Specific Response Characteristics Predict the Magnitude of Multisensory Integration J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 4022 - 4026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Jiang and B. E. Stein Cortex Controls Multisensory Depression in Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2123 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Corneil, M. Van Wanrooij, D. P. Munoz, and A. J. Van Opstal Auditory-Visual Interactions Subserving Goal-Directed Saccades in a Complex Scene J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 438 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Corneil, C. A. Hing, D. V. Bautista, and D. P. Munoz Human Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in a Distractor Task. I. Truncated Gaze Shifts J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1390 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Corneil and D. P. Munoz Human Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in a Distractor Task. II. Reduced Threshold for Initiation of Early Head Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1406 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Dorris, T. L. Taylor, R. M. Klein, and D. P. Munoz Influence of Previous Visual Stimulus or Saccade on Saccadic Reaction Times in Monkey J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2429 - 2436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help