WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (51)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenlee, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenlee, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Volume 17, Number 2, Issue of January 15, 1997 pp. 804-818
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience

Detection and Discrimination of First- and Second-Order Motion in Patients with Unilateral Brain Damage

Received July 15, 1996; revised Oct. 25, 1996; accepted Nov. 1, 1996.

Mark W. Greenlee1 and Andy T. Smith2

1 Neurologische Universitätsklinik, Freiburg, Germany, and 2 Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway College, University of London, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom

The present investigation explored the extent to which extrastriate cortex is necessary for various aspects of motion processing and whether the processing of first-order (Fourier) and second-order (non-Fourier) motion involves the same extrastriate cortical regions. Orientation, direction, and speed discrimination thresholds were measured in 21 patients with unilateral damage to the lateral occipital, temporal, or posterior parietal cortex. Their results were compared with those of 14 age-matched control subjects. The stimuli were static random-dot noise patterns, the luminance of which (first-order) or contrast (second-order) was modulated by a drifting sinusoid. Each image was presented at an eccentricity of 5.6 deg in one of the four visual quadrants. The contrasts required to identify orientation and direction were measured in a forced-choice paradigm for three speeds (1.5, 3, and 6 deg/sec). Speed discrimination performance was measured for stimuli presented simultaneously in two of the four quadrants. The results indicate the following: (1) orientation thresholds were increased only slightly in the patients; (2) direction thresholds were modestly elevated, and this effect was more pronounced for second-order stimuli than for first-order stimuli; (3) speed discrimination thresholds were elevated significantly in the patients with lesions in the region bordering superior-temporal and lateral-occipital cortex; and (4) speed discrimination thresholds for first-order stimuli were more elevated than those for second-order stimuli. The results suggest that there is substantial overlap in the cortical areas involved in first- and second-order speed discrimination.

Key words: motion perception; direction discrimination; speed discrimination; second-order motion; human cortex; contrast sensitivity; spatiotemporal vision; psychophysics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Ashida, A. Lingnau, M. B. Wall, and A. T. Smith
fMRI Adaptation Reveals Separate Mechanisms for First-Order and Second-Order Motion
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1319 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. R. Huxlin and T. Pasternak
Training-induced Recovery of Visual Motion Perception after Extrastriate Cortical Damage in the Adult Cat
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. O. Dumoulin, C. L. Baker Jr, R. F. Hess, and A. C. Evans
Cortical Specialization for Processing First- and Second-order Motion
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2003; 13(12): 1375 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.'y. Nishida, Y. Sasaki, I. Murakami, T. Watanabe, and R. B. H. Tootell
Neuroimaging of Direction-Selective Mechanisms for Second-Order Motion
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3242 - 3254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. E. Seiffert, D. C. Somers, A. M. Dale, and R. B.H. Tootell
Functional MRI Studies of Human Visual Motion Perception: Texture, Luminance, Attention and After-effects
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2003; 13(4): 340 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. Freitag, M.W. Greenlee, K. Wachter, Th.M. Ettlin, and E.W. Radue
fMRI Response During Visual Motion Stimulation in Patients with Late Whiplash Syndrome
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 31 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. T. Smith, M. W. Greenlee, K. D. Singh, F. M. Kraemer, and J. Hennig
The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1998; 18(10): 3816 - 3830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-