 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Previous Article | Next Article
Volume 17, Number 5, Issue of March 1, 1997 pp. 1815-1824
Copyright ©1997 Society for NeuroscienceEffects of Interaural Intensity Difference on the Processing of Interaural Time Difference in the Owl's Nucleus Laminaris
Received Sept. 19, 1996; revised Dec. 4, 1996; accepted Dec. 16, 1996.
Svenja Viete, José Luis Peña, and Masakazu Konishi Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Interaural time and intensity differences (ITD and IID) are processed independently in the owl's auditory system. This paper examines whether this independence is established in nucleus laminaris (NL), the first site of ITD processing. A plot of discharge rate against time difference (ITD curve) is sinusoidal in NL. The ITDs that produce the peaks are called the most favorable ITDs, and those that produce the troughs are called the least favorable ITDs. IID had little effect on the discharge rates of laminaris neurons for the most and least favorable ITDs. The degree of peak-trough modulation changed slightly with variation in IID. In contrast, IID in tonal stimuli affected the temporal aspect of ITD curves depending on the difference between the stimulus frequency and the neuron's best frequency (BF). For frequencies below BF, IID caused large and systematic shifts in ITD toward the ear in which the sound was louder, whereas for frequencies above BF, IID caused small shifts in ITD toward the opposite ear. IID had little effect on ITD curves taken with BF or broadband noise. These results can be largely accounted for by the effects of frequency and intensity on the timing of impulses at the level of the cochlear nuclei. Thus, the processing of ITD by NL neurons is independent of IID for behaviorally relevant stimuli, because the timing of impulses is insensitive to sound level when the signal is broadband.
Key words: owl; sound localization; nucleus laminaris; interaural time difference; interaural intensity difference; parallel pathways
This article has been cited by other articles:
M. L. Perez, S. J. Shanbhag, and J. L. Pena
Auditory Spatial Tuning at the Crossroads of the Midbrain and Forebrain
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1472 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Z.-Q. Tang, H. Gao, and Y. Lu
Control of a Depolarizing GABAergic Input in an Auditory Coincidence Detection Circuit
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1672 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
H. Wagner, S. Brill, R. Kempter, and C. E. Carr
Auditory Responses in the Barn Owl's Nucleus Laminaris to Clicks: Impulse Response and Signal Analysis of Neurophonic Potential
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1227 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. E. Carr, D. Soares, J. Smolders, and J. Z. Simon
Detection of Interaural Time Differences in the Alligator
J. Neurosci., June 24, 2009; 29(25): 7978 - 7990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. A. Weiss, T. Preuss, and D. S. Faber
Phase Encoding in the Mauthner System: Implications in Left-Right Sound Source Discrimination
J. Neurosci., March 18, 2009; 29(11): 3431 - 3441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. J. Fischer, G. B. Christianson, and J. L. Pena
Cross-Correlation in the Auditory Coincidence Detectors of Owls
J. Neurosci., August 6, 2008; 28(32): 8107 - 8115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. J. Fischer, J. L. Pena, and M. Konishi
Emergence of Multiplicative Auditory Responses in the Midbrain of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1181 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. L. Perez and J. L. Pena
Comparison of Midbrain and Thalamic Space-Specific Neurons in Barn Owls
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
H. Wagner, S. Brill, R. Kempter, and C. E. Carr
Microsecond Precision of Phase Delay in the Auditory System of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1655 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V. K. Dasika, J. A. White, L. H. Carney, and H. S. Colburn
Effects of Inhibitory Feedback in a Network Model of Avian Brain Stem
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 400 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. Vogel, R. M. Hennig, and B. Ronacher
Increase of Neuronal Response Variability at Higher Processing Levels as Revealed by Simultaneous Recordings
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3548 - 3559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
H. Kuba, R. Yamada, I. Fukui, and H. Ohmori
Tonotopic Specialization of Auditory Coincidence Detection in Nucleus Laminaris of the Chick
J. Neurosci., February 23, 2005; 25(8): 1924 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. L. Pena, S. Viete, K. Funabiki, K. Saberi, and M. Konishi
Cochlear and Neural Delays for Coincidence Detection in Owls
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 9455 - 9459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. L. Pena and M. Konishi
Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus
PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11787 - 11792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. Grothe and T. J. Park
Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences in the Medial Superior Olive of a Small Mammal, the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat
J. Neurosci., August 15, 1998; 18(16): 6608 - 6622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. Metzner and J. Juranek
A sensory brain map for each behavior?
PNAS, December 23, 1997; 94(26): 14798 - 14803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|