Volume 17, Number 5,
Issue of March 1, 1997
pp. 1860-1868
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
A Test of the Excitability-Gradient Hypothesis in the Swimmeret
System of Crayfish
Received Oct. 22, 1996; revised Dec. 18, 1996; accepted Dec. 19, 1996.
Brian Mulloney
Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior,
University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616-8755
The motor pattern that drives coordinated movements of swimmerets
in different segments during forward swimming characteristically begins
with a power-stroke by the most posterior limbs, followed progressively
by power-strokes of each of the more anterior limbs. To explain this
caudal-to-rostral progression, the hypothesis was proposed that the
neurons that drive the most posterior swimmerets are more excitable
than their more anterior counterparts, and so reach threshold
first.
To test this excitability-gradient hypothesis, I used carbachol to
excite expression of the swimmeret motor pattern and used tetrodotoxin
(TTX), sucrose solutions, and cutting to block the flow of
information between anterior and posterior segments. I showed that the
swimmeret activity elicited by carbachol is like that produced when the
swimmeret system is spontaneously active and that blocking an
intersegmental connective uncoupled swimmeret activity on opposite
sides of the block.
When anterior and posterior segments were isolated from each other, the
frequencies of the motor patterns expressed by anterior segments were
not slower than those expressed by posterior segments exposed to the
same concentrations of carbachol. This result was independent of the
concentration of carbachol applied and of the number of segmental
ganglia that remained connected. When TTX was used to block information
flow, the motor patterns produced in segments anterior to the block
were significantly faster than those from segments posterior to the
block.
These observations contradict the predictions of the
excitability-gradient hypothesis and lead to the conclusion that the hypothesis is incorrect.
Key words:
pattern-generation;
locomotion;
coordination;
motor
control;
excitability-gradient