 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Previous Article | Next Article
Volume 17, Number 9, Issue of May 1, 1997 pp. 3312-3321
Copyright ©1997 Society for NeurosciencePhase Locking to High Frequencies in the Auditory Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Barn Owl, Tyto alba
Received Dec. 4, 1996; revised Jan. 27, 1997; accepted Feb. 14, 1997.
Christine Köppl Institut für Zoologie der Technischen Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85747 Garching, Germany
The auditory system of the barn owl is an important model for temporal processing on a very fast time scale and for the neural mechanisms and circuitry underlying sound localization. Phase locking has been shown to be the behaviorally relevant temporal code. This study examined the quality and intensity dependence of phase locking in single auditory nerve fibers of the barn owl to define the input to the known brainstem circuit for temporal processing. For direct comparison in the same individuals, recordings were also obtained from the relevant next higher center, the nucleus magnocellularis (NM). Phase locking was regularly seen at sound pressure levels (SPL) below those eliciting an increase in spike rate, thus providing an additional cue for signal detection. The quality of phase locking, expressed as vector strength, decreased with increasing frequency. Auditory nerve fibers showed an unusual step-like decline with a prominent plateau in the mid-frequency range (1.5-3 kHz), indicating that some specialization enables the owl to halt the deterioration and extend phase locking to frequencies up to 10 kHz, above the range commonly observed in other species. Phase locking in the NM was consistently inferior to that of auditory-nerve fibers at frequencies above 1 kHz, suggesting that the synapse plays a limiting role in temporal precision. The response delays, or group delays, derived from the phase-versus-frequency functions of auditory nerve fibers were not consistent with the unusual spatial frequency representation in the owl cochlea. This questions the common assumption that group delays reflect cochlear wave travel times.
Key words: phase locking; auditory nerve; Nucleus magnocellularis; cochlear nucleus; group delay; ITD; bird; owl
This article has been cited by other articles:
H. Kuba and H. Ohmori
Roles of axonal sodium channels in precise auditory time coding at nucleus magnocellularis of the chick
J. Physiol., January 1, 2009; 587(1): 87 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. Avissar, A. C. Furman, J. C. Saunders, and T. D. Parsons
Adaptation Reduces Spike-Count Reliability, But Not Spike-Timing Precision, of Auditory Nerve Responses
J. Neurosci., June 13, 2007; 27(24): 6461 - 6472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
G. B. Christianson and J. L. Pena
Preservation of Spectrotemporal Tuning Between the Nucleus Laminaris and the Inferior Colliculus of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3544 - 3553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
G. Ashida, K. Abe, K. Funabiki, and M. Konishi
Passive Soma Facilitates Submillisecond Coincidence Detection in the Owl's Auditory System
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2267 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
I. Fukui, T. Sato, and H. Ohmori
Improvement of Phase Information at Low Sound Frequency in Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Chicken
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 633 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
G. B. Christianson and J. L. Pena
Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.
J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5948 - 5954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. C. Keen and A. J. Hudspeth
Transfer characteristics of the hair cell's afferent synapse
PNAS, April 4, 2006; 103(14): 5537 - 5542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. A. Sisneros, P. M. Forlano, D. L. Deitcher, and A. H. Bass
Steroid-Dependent Auditory Plasticity Leads to Adaptive Coupling of Sender and Receiver
Science, July 16, 2004; 305(5682): 404 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. D. Eisen, M. Spassova, and T. D. Parsons
Large Releasable Pool of Synaptic Vesicles in Chick Cochlear Hair Cells
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2422 - 2428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. Koppl and C. E. Carr
Computational Diversity in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 2313 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. Suzuki, J. Kozloski, and J. D. Crawford
Temporal Encoding for Auditory Computation: Physiology of Primary Afferent Neurons in Sound-Producing Fish
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2002; 22(14): 6290 - 6301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. Martin, A. D. Mehta, and A. J. Hudspeth
Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell
PNAS, October 4, 2000; (2000) 210389497.
[Abstract] [Full Text]
P. Monsivais, L. Yang, and E. W Rubel
GABAergic Inhibition in Nucleus Magnocellularis: Implications for Phase Locking in the Avian Auditory Brainstem
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2000; 20(8): 2954 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. Camalet, T. Duke, F. Julicher, and J. Prost
Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells
PNAS, March 28, 2000; 97(7): 3183 - 3188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. Koppl and G. Yates
Coding of Sound Pressure Level in the Barn Owl's Auditory Nerve
J. Neurosci., November 1, 1999; 19(21): 9674 - 9686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. Martin, A. D. Mehta, and A. J. Hudspeth
Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell
PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 12026 - 12031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. Martin and A. J. Hudspeth
Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation
PNAS, December 4, 2001; 98(25): 14386 - 14391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|