QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (76) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brushart, T. M. Articles by Royall, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brushart, T. M. Articles by Royall, R. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1, 1998, 18(21):8674-8681

Contributions of Pathway and Neuron to Preferential Motor Reinnervation

Thomas M. Brushart^{1, 2}, Jonathan Gerber², Philip Kessens², You-Gang Chen¹, and Richard M. Royall³

¹ The Raymond M. Curtis Hand Center, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, ² Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, and ³ Department of Biostatistics and Statistics, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287

Motor axons regenerating after transection of mixed nerve preferentially reinnervate distal muscle branches, a process termed preferential motor reinnervation (PMR). Motor axon collaterals appear to enter both cutaneous and muscle Schwann cell tubes on a random basis. Double-labeling studies suggest that PMR is generated by pruning collaterals from cutaneous pathways while maintaining those in motor pathways (the "pruning hypothesis"). If all collaterals projecting to muscle are saved, then stimulation of regenerative sprouting should increase specificity by increasing the number of motoneurons with at least one collateral in a muscle pathway. In the current experiments, collateral sprouting is stimulated by crushing the nerve proximal to the repair site before suture, a maneuver that also conditions the neuron and predegenerates the distal pathway. Control experiments are performed to separate these effects from those of collateral generation.

Experiments were performed on the rat femoral nerve and evaluated by exposing its terminal cutaneous and muscle branches to HRP or Fluoro-Gold. Crush proximal to the repair site increased motor axon collaterals at least fivefold and significantly increased the percentage of correctly projecting motoneurons, consistent with the pruning hypothesis. Conditioning the nerve with distal crushes before repair had no effect on specificity. A graft model was used to separate the effects of collateral generation and distal stump predegeneration. Previous crush of the proximal femoral nerve significantly increased the specificity of fresh graft reinnervation. Stimulation of regenerative collateral sprouting thus increased PMR, confirming the pruning hypothesis. However, this effect was overshadowed by the dramatic specificity with which predegenerated grafts were reinnervated by fresh uncrushed proximal axons. These unexpected effects of predegeneration on specificity could involve a variety of possible mechanisms and warrant further study because of their mechanistic and clinical implications.

Key words: predegeneration; specificity; regeneration; nerve graft; motoneuron; conditioning

---

Copyright © 1998 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/98/18218674-08$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. K. Franz, U. Rutishauser, and V. F. Rafuse Intrinsic neuronal properties control selective targeting of regenerating motoneurons Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1492 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Franz, U. Rutishauser, and V. F. Rafuse Polysialylated Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Is Necessary for Selective Targeting of Regenerating Motor Neurons J. Neurosci., February 23, 2005; 25(8): 2081 - 2091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Leterme and F Tyc Re-innervation and recovery of rat soleus muscle and motor unit function after nerve crush Exp Physiol, July 1, 2004; 89(4): 353 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Brushart, P. N. Hoffman, R. M. Royall, B. B. Murinson, C. Witzel, and T. Gordon Electrical Stimulation Promotes Motoneuron Regeneration without Increasing Its Speed or Conditioning the Neuron J. Neurosci., August 1, 2002; 22(15): 6631 - 6638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Zealear, R. J. Rodriguez, T. Kenny, M. J. Billante, Y. Cho, C. R. Billante, and K. C. Garren Electrical Stimulation of a Denervated Muscle Promotes Selective Reinnervation by Native Over Foreign Motoneurons J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 2195 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Al-Majed, C. M. Neumann, T. M. Brushart, and T. Gordon Brief Electrical Stimulation Promotes the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Axonal Regeneration J. Neurosci., April 1, 2000; 20(7): 2602 - 2608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Madison, S. J. Archibald, R. Lacin, and C. Krarup Factors Contributing to Preferential Motor Reinnervation in the Primate Peripheral Nervous System J. Neurosci., December 15, 1999; 19(24): 11007 - 11016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help