 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 1998, 18(7):2626-2645
Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory
Cortex in the Alert Monkey
James J.
DiCarlo,
Kenneth O.
Johnson, and
Steven S.
Hsiao
Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Department of Neuroscience, and
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
We investigated the two-dimensional structure of area 3b neuronal
receptive fields (RFs) in three alert monkeys. Three hundred thirty
neurons with RFs on the distal fingerpads were studied with scanned,
random dot stimuli. Each neuron was stimulated continuously for 14 min,
yielding 20,000 response data points. Excitatory and inhibitory
components of each RF were determined with a modified linear regression
algorithm. Analyses assessing goodness-of-fit, repeatability, and
generality of the RFs were developed. Two hundred forty-seven neurons
yielded highly repeatable RF estimates, and most RFs accounted for a
large fraction of the explainable response of each neuron. Although the
area 3b RF structures appeared to be continuously distributed, certain
structural generalities were apparent. Most RFs (94%) contained a
single, central region of excitation and one or more regions of
inhibition located on one, two, three, or all four sides of the
excitatory center. The shape, area, and strength of excitatory and
inhibitory RF regions ranged widely. Half the RFs contained almost
evenly balanced excitation and inhibition. The findings indicate that
area 3b neurons act as local spatiotemporal filters that are maximally
excited by the presence of particular stimulus features. We believe
that form and texture perception are based on high-level
representations and that area 3b is an intermediate stage in the
processes leading to these representations. Two possibilities are
considered: (1) that these high-level representations are basically
somatotopic and that area 3b neurons amplify some features and suppress
others, or (2) that these representations are highly transformed and
that area 3b effects a step in the transformation.
Key words:
receptive field; somatosensory; cortex; tactile; form; texture; area 3b; SI; monkey; first-order kernel; reverse
correlation
Copyright © 1998 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/98/1872626-20$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Reed, P. Pouget, H.-X. Qi, Z. Zhou, M. R. Bernard, M. J. Burish, J. Haitas, A. B. Bonds, and J. H. Kaas
Widespread spatial integration in primary somatosensory cortex
PNAS,
July 22, 2008;
105(29):
10233 - 10237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Foffani, J. K. Chapin, and K. A. Moxon
Computational Role of Large Receptive Fields in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2008;
100(1):
268 - 280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Stilla, G. Deshpande, S. LaConte, X. Hu, and K. Sathian
Posteromedial Parietal Cortical Activity and Inputs Predict Tactile Spatial Acuity
J. Neurosci.,
October 10, 2007;
27(41):
11091 - 11102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Atencio, D. T. Blake, F. Strata, S. W. Cheung, M. M. Merzenich, and C. E. Schreiner
Frequency-Modulation Encoding in the Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Owl Monkey
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2007;
98(4):
2182 - 2195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Marasco and K. C. Catania
Response properties of primary afferents supplying Eimer's organ
J. Exp. Biol.,
March 1, 2007;
210(5):
765 - 780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. H. Thakur, P. J. Fitzgerald, J. W. Lane, and S. S. Hsiao
Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Nonlinear Mechanisms Underlying the Representation of Orientation Within a Finger Pad
J. Neurosci.,
December 27, 2006;
26(52):
13567 - 13575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Sripati and K. O. Johnson
Dynamic Gain Changes During Attentional Modulation
Neural Comput.,
August 1, 2006;
18(8):
1847 - 1867.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Fitzgerald, J. W. Lane, P. H. Thakur, and S. S. Hsiao
Receptive field properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: representation of orientation on different finger pads.
J. Neurosci.,
June 14, 2006;
26(24):
6473 - 6484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Fitzgerald, J. W. Lane, P. H. Thakur, and S. S. Hsiao
Receptive field (RF) properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: RF size, shape, and somatotopic organization.
J. Neurosci.,
June 14, 2006;
26(24):
6485 - 6495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Sripati, S. J. Bensmaia, and K. O. Johnson
A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial Patterns
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2006;
95(6):
3852 - 3864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hollins, F. Lorenz, and D. Harper
Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch.
J. Neurosci.,
May 17, 2006;
26(20):
5582 - 5588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Sripati, T. Yoshioka, P. Denchev, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson
Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Peripheral Afferents and Cortical Area 3b and 1 Neurons in the Primate Somatosensory System
J. Neurosci.,
February 15, 2006;
26(7):
2101 - 2114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Blake, F. Strata, R. Kempter, and M. M. Merzenich
Experience-Dependent Plasticity in S1 Caused by Noncoincident Inputs
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2005;
94(3):
2239 - 2250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Swadlow, Y. Bereshpolova, T. Bezdudnaya, M. Cano, and C. R. Stoelzel
A Multi-Channel, Implantable Microdrive System for Use With Sharp, Ultra-Fine "Reitboeck" Microelectrodes
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2005;
93(5):
2959 - 2965.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Cook and J. H. R. Maunsell
Attentional Modulation of Motion Integration of Individual Neurons in the Middle Temporal Visual Area
J. Neurosci.,
September 8, 2004;
24(36):
7964 - 7977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Blake and M. M. Merzenich
Changes of AI Receptive Fields With Sound Density
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2002;
88(6):
3409 - 3420.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Lau, G. B. Stanley, and Y. Dan
Computational subunits of visual cortical neurons revealed by artificial neural networks
PNAS,
June 25, 2002;
99(13):
8974 - 8979.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. N. S. Sachdev and K. C. Catania
Receptive Fields and Response Properties of Neurons in the Star-Nosed Mole's Somatosensory Fovea
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2002;
87(5):
2602 - 2611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yoshioka, B. Gibb, A. K. Dorsch, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson
Neural Coding Mechanisms Underlying Perceived Roughness of Finely Textured Surfaces
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 2001;
21(17):
6905 - 6916.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Cascio and K. Sathian
Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 2001;
21(14):
5289 - 5296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Jenison, J. W. H. Schnupp, R. A. Reale, and J. F. Brugge
Auditory Space-Time Receptive Field Dynamics Revealed by Spherical White-Noise Analysis
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2001;
21(12):
4408 - 4415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Yu and E. D. Young
Linear and nonlinear pathways of spectral information transmission in the cochlear nucleus
PNAS,
October 24, 2000;
97(22):
11780 - 11786.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. I. Moore, C. E. Stern, S. Corkin, B. Fischl, A. C. Gray, B. R. Rosen, and A. M. Dale
Segregation of Somatosensory Activation in the Human Rolandic Cortex Using fMRI
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2000;
84(1):
558 - 569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sathian
Intermanual referral of sensation to anesthetic hands
Neurology,
May 9, 2000;
54(9):
1866 - 1868.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Apkarian, P. A. Gelnar, B. R. Krauss, and N. M. Szeverenyi
Cortical Responses to Thermal Pain Depend on Stimulus Size: A Functional MRI Study
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2000;
83(5):
3113 - 3122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson
Spatial and Temporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Primate Somatosensory Area 3b: Effects of Stimulus Scanning Direction and Orientation
J. Neurosci.,
January 1, 2000;
20(1):
495 - 510.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. I. Receptive Fields and Discharge Patterns
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 1999;
81(2):
825 - 834.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. II. Responses to Object Texture and Weights
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 1999;
81(2):
835 - 844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson
Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey
J. Neurosci.,
January 1, 1999;
19(1):
401 - 419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|