 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 1, 1999, 19(1):40-47
A Mathematical Model for the Intracellular Circadian Rhythm
Generator
Tjeerd olde
Scheper1,
Don
Klinkenberg2,
Cyriel
Pennartz2, and
Jaap
van
Pelt2
1 Oxford Brookes University, School for Computing and
Math Science, Gipsy Lane Campus, OX3 0BP Headington Oxford, United
Kingdom, and 2 Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam,
Netherlands Institute for Brain Research, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
A mathematical model for the intracellular circadian rhythm
generator has been studied, based on a negative feedback of protein products on the transcription rate of their genes. The study is an
attempt at examining minimal but biologically realistic requirements for a negative molecular feedback loop involving considerably faster
reactions, to produce (slow) circadian oscillations. The model included
mRNA and protein production and degradation, along with a negative
feedback of the proteins upon mRNA production. The protein production
process was described solely by its total duration and a nonlinear
term, whereas also the feedback included nonlinear interactions among
protein molecules. This system was found to produce robust oscillations
in protein and mRNA levels over a wide range of parameter values.
Oscillations were slow, with periods much longer than the time
constants of any of the individual system parameters. Circadian
oscillations were obtained for realistic values of the parameters. The
system was readily entrainable to external periodic perturbations. Two
distinct classes of phase response curves were found, viz. with or
without a time domain within the circadian cycle in which external
perturbations fail to induce a phase shift ("dead zone"). The delay
and nonlinearity in the protein production and the cooperativity in the
negative feedback (Hill coefficient) were for this model found to be
necessary and sufficient to generate robust circadian oscillations. The similarities between model outcomes and empirical findings establish that circadian rhythmicity at the cellular level can plausibly emerge
from interactions among molecular systems which are not in themselves rhythmic.
Key words:
SCN; circadian rhythm; molecular clock; entrainment; phase-response curves; models
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/19140-08$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Li and X. Lang
Internal Noise-Sustained Circadian Rhythms in a Drosophila Model
Biophys. J.,
March 15, 2008;
94(6):
1983 - 1994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Zhao, H. Li, W. Hou, and R. Wu
Wavelet-Based Parametric Functional Mapping of Developmental Trajectories With High-Dimensional Data
Genetics,
July 1, 2007;
176(3):
1879 - 1892.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Kwon, J. Lee, S. H. Chang, N. C. Jung, B. J. Lee, G. H. Son, K. Kim, and K. H. Lee
BMAL1 Shuttling Controls Transactivation and Degradation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 Heterodimer.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 1, 2006;
26(19):
7318 - 7330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Leise and H. Siegelmann
Dynamics of a multistage circadian system.
J Biol Rhythms,
August 1, 2006;
21(4):
314 - 323.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bratsun, D. Volfson, L. S. Tsimring, and J. Hasty
Delay-induced stochastic oscillations in gene regulation
PNAS,
October 11, 2005;
102(41):
14593 - 14598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Becker-Weimann, J. Wolf, H. Herzel, and A. Kramer
Modeling Feedback Loops of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator
Biophys. J.,
November 1, 2004;
87(5):
3023 - 3034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. D. Herzog, S. J. Aton, R. Numano, Y. Sakaki, and H. Tei
Temporal Precision in the Mammalian Circadian System: A Reliable Clock from Less Reliable Neurons
J Biol Rhythms,
February 1, 2004;
19(1):
35 - 46.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tsuchiya and E. Nishida
Mammalian Cultured Cells as a Model System of Peripheral Circadian Clocks
J. Biochem.,
December 1, 2003;
134(6):
785 - 790.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Smolen, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne
A Reduced Model Clarifies the Role of Feedback Loops and Time Delays in the Drosophila Circadian Oscillator
Biophys. J.,
November 1, 2002;
83(5):
2349 - 2359.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. De Jeu and C. Pennartz
Circadian Modulation of GABA Function in the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Excitatory Effects During the Night Phase
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2002;
87(2):
834 - 844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Smolen, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne
Modeling Circadian Oscillations with Interlocking Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 2001;
21(17):
6644 - 6656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Shimomura, S. S. Low-Zeddies, D. P. King, T. D.L. Steeves, A. Whiteley, J. Kushla, P. D. Zemenides, A. Lin, M. H. Vitaterna, G. A. Churchill, et al.
Genome-Wide Epistatic Interaction Analysis Reveals Complex Genetic Determinants of Circadian Behavior in Mice
Genome Res.,
June 1, 2001;
11(6):
959 - 980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|