QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Erwin, E. Articles by Miller, K. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Erwin, E. Articles by Miller, K. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 1999, 19(16):7212-7229

The Subregion Correspondence Model of Binocular Simple Cells

Ed Erwin^{1, 4} and Kenneth D. Miller^{2, 3, 4, 5}

Departments of ¹ Physiology and ² Otolaryngology, ³ Neuroscience Graduate Program, ⁴ W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, and ⁵ Sloan Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444

We explore the hypothesis that binocular simple cells in cat areas 17 and 18 show subregion correspondence, defined as follows: within the region of overlap of the two eye's receptive fields, their ON subregions lie in corresponding locations, as do their OFF subregions. This hypothesis is motivated by a developmental model (Erwin and Miller, 1998) that suggested that simple cells could develop binocularly matched preferred orientations and spatial frequencies by developing subregion correspondence.

Binocular organization of simple cell receptive fields is commonly characterized by two quantities: interocular position shift, the distance in visual space between the center positions of the two eye's receptive fields; and interocular phase shift, the difference in the spatial phases of those receptive fields, each measured relative to its center position. The subregion correspondence hypothesis implies that interocular position and phase shifts are linearly related. We compare this hypothesis with the null hypothesis, assumed by most previous models of binocular organization, that the two types of shift are uncorrelated.

We demonstrate that the subregion correspondence and null hypotheses are equally consistent with previous measurements of binocular response properties of individual simple cells in the cat and other species and with measurements of the distribution of interocular phase shifts versus preferred orientations or versus interocular position shifts. However, the observed tendency of binocular simple cells in the cat to have "tuned excitatory" disparity tuning curves with preferred disparities tightly clustered around zero (Fischer and Krüger, 1979; Ferster, 1981; LeVay and Voigt, 1988) follows naturally from the subregion correspondence hypothesis but is inconsistent with the null hypothesis.

We describe tests that could more conclusively differentiate between the hypotheses. The most straightforward test requires simultaneous determination of the receptive fields of groups of three or more binocular simple cells.

Key words: binocular cell; simple cell; ON-center; OFF-center; cat visual cortex; striate cortex; disparity tuning; owl visual Wulst; model

---

Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/99/19167212-18$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.J.D. Prince, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker Range and Mechanism of Encoding of Horizontal Disparity in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 209 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help