QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shiller, D. M. Articles by Gribble, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shiller, D. M. Articles by Gribble, P. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 1999, 19(20):9073-9080

Effects of Gravitational Load on Jaw Movements in Speech

Douglas M. Shiller¹, David J. Ostry¹, and Paul L. Gribble¹

¹ McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1

External loads arising as a result of the orientation of body segments relative to gravity can affect the achievement of movement goals. The degree to which subjects adjust control signals to compensate for these loads is a reflection of the extent to which forces affecting motion are represented neurally. In the present study we assessed whether subjects, when speaking, compensate for loads caused by the orientation of the head relative to gravity. We used a mathematical model of the jaw to predict the effects of control signals that are not adjusted for changes to head orientation. The simulations predicted a systematic change in sagittal plane jaw orientation and horizontal position resulting from changes to the orientation of the head. We conducted an empirical study in which subjects were tested under the same conditions. With one exception, empirical results were consistent with the simulations. In both simulation and empirical studies, the jaw was rotated closer to occlusion and translated in an anterior direction when the head was in the prone orientation. When the head was in the supine orientation, the jaw was rotated away from occlusion. The findings suggest that the nervous system does not completely compensate for changes in head orientation relative to gravity. A second study was conducted to assess possible changes in acoustical patterns attributable to changes in head orientation. The frequencies of the first (F1) and second (F2) formants associated with the steady-state portion of vowels were measured. As in the kinematic study, systematic differences in the values of F1 and F2 were observed with changes in head orientation. Thus the acoustical analysis further supports the conclusion that control signals are not completely adjusted to offset forces arising because of changes in orientation.

Key words: speech; jaw; gravity; movement; compensation; mathematical model

---

Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/99/19209073-08$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Shiller, R. Laboissiere, and D. J. Ostry Relationship Between Jaw Stiffness and Kinematic Variability in Speech J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2329 - 2340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Shiller, D. J. Ostry, P. L. Gribble, and R. Laboissiere Compensation for the Effects of Head Acceleration on Jaw Movement in Speech J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 6447 - 6456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help