WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Stereo Investigator
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Köppl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Köppl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, G.

 Previous Article

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1, 1999, 19(21):9674-9686

Coding of Sound Pressure Level in the Barn Owl's Auditory Nerve

Christine Köppl1 and Graeme Yates2

1 Institut für Zoologie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany, and 2 The Auditory Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6907, Western Australia

Rate-intensity functions, i.e., the relation between discharge rate and sound pressure level, were recorded from single auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl. Differences in sound pressure level between the owl's two ears are known to be an important cue in sound localization. One objective was therefore to quantify the discharge rates of auditory nerve fibers, as a basis for higher-order processing of sound pressure level. The second aim was to investigate the rate-intensity functions for cues to the underlying cochlear mechanisms, using a model developed in mammals.

Rate-intensity functions at the most sensitive frequency mostly showed a well-defined breakpoint between an initial steep segment and a progressively flattening segment. This shape has, in mammals, been convincingly traced to a compressive nonlinearity in the cochlear mechanics, which in turn is a reflection of the cochlear amplifier enhancing low-level stimuli. The similarity of the rate-intensity functions of the barn owl is thus further evidence for a similar mechanism in birds. An interesting difference from mammalian data was that this compressive nonlinearity was not shared among fibers of similar characteristic frequency, suggesting a different mechanism with a more locally differentiated operation than in mammals.

In all fibers, the steepest change in discharge rate with rising sound pressure level occurred within 10-20 dB of their respective thresholds. Because the range of neural thresholds at any one characteristic frequency is small in the owl, auditory nerve fibers were collectively most sensitive for changes in sound pressure level within ~30 dB of the best thresholds. Fibers most sensitive to high frequencies (>6-7 kHz) showed a smaller increase of rate above spontaneous discharge rate than did lower-frequency fibers.

Key words: hearing; cochlea; basilar papilla; interaural intensity difference; rate-intensity function; bird


Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/99/19219674-13$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. N. Shivdasani, S. J. Mauger, G. D. Rathbone, and A. G. Paolini
Inferior Colliculus Responses to Multichannel Microstimulation of the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus: Implications for Auditory Brain Stem Implants
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Heil, H. Neubauer, D. R. F. Irvine, and M. Brown
Spontaneous Activity of Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Insights into Stochastic Processes at Ribbon Synapses
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8457 - 8474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. L. Spezio and T. T. Takahashi
Frequency-Specific Interaural Level Difference Tuning Predicts Spatial Response Patterns of Space-Specific Neurons in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 4677 - 4688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Koppl and C. E. Carr
Computational Diversity in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 2313 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Saunders, C. E. Ventetuolo, S. K.-R. Plontke, and B. A. Weiss
Coding of Sound Intensity in the Chick Cochlear Nerve
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 2887 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Heil and H. Neubauer
Temporal Integration of Sound Pressure Determines Thresholds of Auditory-Nerve Fibers
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7404 - 7415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. A. Manley
Evidence for an Active Process and a Cochlear Amplifier in Nonmammals
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 541 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. A. Manley
Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint
PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11736 - 11743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-