WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2000, 20(18):7011-7016

Stimulus-Based State Control in the Thalamocortical System

Lee M. Miller and Christoph E. Schreiner

W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, and University of California San Francisco/Berkeley Bioengineering Group, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94143

Neural systems operate in various dynamic states that determine how they process information (Livingstone and Hubel, 1981; Funke and Eysel, 1992; Morrow and Casey, 1992; Abeles et al., 1995; Guido et al., 1995; Mukherjee and Kaplan, 1995; Kenmochi and Eggermont, 1997; Wörgötter et al., 1998; Kisley and Gerstein, 1999). To investigate the function of a brain area, it is therefore crucial to determine the state of that system. One grave difficulty is that even under well controlled conditions, the thalamocortical network may undergo random dynamic state fluctuations which alter the most basic spatial and temporal response properties of the neurons. These uncontrolled state changes hinder the evaluation of state-specific properties of neural processing and, consequently, the interpretation of thalamocortical function.

Simultaneous extracellular recordings were made in the auditory thalamus and cortex of the ketamine-anesthetized cat under several stimulus conditions. By considering the cellular and network mechanisms that govern state changes, we develop a complex stimulus that controls the dynamic state of the thalamocortical network. Traditional auditory stimuli have ambivalent effects on thalamocortical state, sometimes eliciting an oscillatory state prevalent in sleeping animals and other times suppressing it. By contrast, our complex stimulus clamps the network in a dynamic state resembling that observed in the alert animal. It thus allows evaluation of neural information processing not confounded by uncontrolled variations. Stimulus-based state control illustrates a general and direct mechanism whereby the functional modes of the brain are influenced by structural features of the external world.

Key words: dynamic state; thalamocortical; spindles; oscillations; ketamine; alerting stimuli; burst mode; tonic mode


Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/00/20187011-06$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. A. Atencio and C. E. Schreiner
Spectrotemporal Processing Differences between Auditory Cortical Fast-Spiking and Regular-Spiking Neurons
J. Neurosci., April 9, 2008; 28(15): 3897 - 3910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Destexhe and D. Contreras
Neuronal computations with stochastic network states.
Science, October 6, 2006; 314(5796): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Eggermont
Properties of Correlated Neural Activity Clusters in Cat Auditory Cortex Resemble Those of Neural Assemblies
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 746 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Moshitch, L. Las, N. Ulanovsky, O. Bar-Yosef, and I. Nelken
Responses of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex (A1) to Pure Tones in the Halothane-Anesthetized Cat
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3756 - 3769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. van der Togt, S. Kalitzin, H. Spekreijse, V. A.F. Lamme, and H. Super
Synchrony Dynamics in Monkey V1 Predict Success in Visual Detection
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 136 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Tomita and J. J. Eggermont
Cross-Correlation and Joint Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field Properties in Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 378 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, H. L. Read, and C. E. Schreiner
Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus and Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 516 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, and C. E. Schreiner
Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System
J. Neurosci., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 8136 - 8144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-