WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience The New Axio Examiner
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, B.
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, B.
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2000, 20(18):7043-7051

Common Firing Patterns of Hippocampal Cells in a Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates of Response Schedule

Brian Young and Neil McNaughton

Department of Psychology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Lesion studies show that the hippocampus is critically involved in timing behavior, but so far there has been little analysis of how it might encode time. We recorded the activity of 266 CA1 neurons, 51 CA3 neurons, and 219 entorhinal neurons from rats performing on a differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) 15 sec schedule in which reinforcement was contingent on responses that occurred at least 15 sec after the preceding response. The unit data were analyzed using two different methods. First, each unit was subjected to an ANOVA that examined the effects of the following: (1) the outcome of the previous response (reward or nonreward); (2) the outcome of the response on which the firing of the cell was synchronized; and (3) time. This showed that, for CA1, CA3, and entorhinal cortex, changes in unit activity were related to all aspects of the task, with the firing of >90% of units recorded in each region being related to at least one of the three factors. Second, intercorrelations between the firing profiles of individual units revealed several functional categories of hippocampal neurons but no clear categories of entorhinal neurons. Of the hippocampal categories, the most common profile was an initial increase in unit activity at the beginning of the DRL interval, followed by a gradual decrease throughout the interval. We suggest that this profile reflects temporal decay in circuits that may code details of the previous trial and that could be used to "time" the DRL interval.

Key words: hippocampus; entorhinal cortex; timing; temporal processing; single unit; DRL; nonspatial


Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/00/20187043-09$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. D. McEchron, W. Tseng, and J. F. Disterhoft
Single Neurons in CA1 Hippocampus Encode Trace Interval Duration during Trace Heart Rate (Fear) Conditioning in Rabbit
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2003; 23(4): 1535 - 1547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-