QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moody, S. A. Articles by Huang, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moody, S. A. Articles by Huang, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2000, 20(9):3244-3253

Intrinsic Bias and Lineage Restriction in the Phenotype Determination of Dopamine and Neuropeptide Y Amacrine Cells

Sally A. Moody¹, Ida Chow², and Sen Huang¹

¹ Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, George Washington University Medical Center, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, and ² Department of Biology, American University, Washington, DC 20016

Blastomere lineages are differentially biased to produce different neurotransmitter subtypes of amacrine cells (Huang and Moody, 1995, 1997). To elucidate when this bias is acquired, we examined amacrine lineages at different early developmental times. Our experiments demonstrate that the bias to express dopamine and neuropeptide Y amacrine fates involves several steps before the formation of the definitive optic cup. At cleavage stages, a retinal progenitor that contributes large numbers of cells is already biased to produce its normal repertoire of dopamine amacrine cells, as revealed by transplantation to a new location, whereas the amacrine fate of a progenitor that contributes fewer cells is modified by its new position. At neural plate stages, not all retinal progenitors are multipotent. Nearly one-half populate only the inner nuclear layer and are enriched in amacrine cells. During early optic vesicle stages, an appropriate mitotic tree is required for dopamine and neuropeptide Y, but not serotonin, amacrine cell clusters to form. Thus, the acquisition of amacrine fate bias involves intrinsic maternal factors at cleavage, fate restriction in the neural plate, and specified mitotic patterns in the optic vesicle. At each of these steps only a subset of the embryonic retinal progenitors contributing to amacrine subtypes is biased; the remaining progenitors maintain multipotency. Thus, from the earliest embryonic stages, progenitors of the retina are a dynamic mosaic. This is the first experimental demonstration of amacrine fate decisions that occur during early embryonic periods in advance of the events described in the later, committed retina.

Key words: serotonin; cell fate determination; neural plate; eye fields; Xenopus; retina

---

Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/00/2093244-10$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. Mo, S. Li, X. Yang, and M. Xiang Role of the Barhl2 homeobox gene in the specification of glycinergic amacrine cells Development, April 1, 2004; 131(7): 1607 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help