 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 15, 2001, 21(10):3688-3696
A Peripheral Mechanism for Behavioral Adaptation to Specific "Bitter" Taste Stimuli in an Insect
John I. Glendinning, Hannah Brown, Maya Capoor, Adrienne Davis, Amakoe Gbedemah, and Eliza Long Department of Biological Science, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
Animals have evolved several chemosensory systems for detecting potentially dangerous foods in the environment. Activation of specific sensory cells within these chemosensory systems usually elicits an aversive behavioral response, leading to avoidance of the noxious foods. Although this aversive behavioral response can be adaptive, there are many instances in which it generates "false alarms," causing animals to reject harmless foods. To minimize the number of false alarms, animals have evolved a variety of physiological mechanisms for selectively adapting their aversive behavioral response to harmless noxious compounds. We examined the mechanisms underlying exposure-induced adaptation to specific "bitter" compounds in Manduca sexta caterpillars. M. sexta exhibits an aversive behavioral response to many plant-derived compounds that taste bitter to humans, including caffeine and aristolochic acid. This aversive behavioral response is mediated by three pairs of bitter-sensitive taste cells: one responds vigorously to aristolochic acid alone, and the other two respond vigorously to both caffeine and aristolochic acid. We found that 24 hr of exposure to a caffeinated diet desensitized all of the caffeine-responsive taste cells to caffeine but not to aristolochic acid. In addition, we found that dietary exposure to caffeine adapted the aversive behavioral response of the caterpillar to caffeine, but not to aristolochic acid. We propose that the adapted aversive response to caffeine was mediated directly by the desensitized taste cells and that the adapted aversive response did not generalize to aristolochic acid because the signaling pathway for this compound was insulated from that for caffeine.
Key words: taste cell; plasticity; long-term adaptation; bitter taste; ingestive behavior; Manduca sexta
Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/01/21103688-09$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
E. A. Bernays, D. Rodrigues, R. F. Chapman, M. S. Singer, and T. Hartmann
Loss of gustatory responses to pyrrolizidine alkaloids after their extensive ingestion in the polyphagous caterpillar Estigmene acrea
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2003; 206(24): 4487 - 4496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. L. del Campo and C. I. Miles
Chemosensory tuning to a host recognition cue in the facultative specialist larvae of the moth Manduca sexta
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 3979 - 3990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. I. Glendinning, A. Davis, and S. Ramaswamy
Contribution of Different Taste Cells and Signaling Pathways to the Discrimination of "Bitter" Taste Stimuli by an Insect
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 7281 - 7287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. I. Glendinning, S. Domdom, and E. Long
Selective adaptation to noxious foods by a herbivorous insect
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3355 - 3367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|