QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (40) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Passaglia, C. L. Articles by Troy, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Passaglia, C. L. Articles by Troy, J. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, August 1, 2001, 21(15):5794-5803

Effects of Remote Stimulation on the Mean Firing Rate of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells

Christopher L. Passaglia^{1, 2}, Christina Enroth-Cugell¹, and John B. Troy¹

¹ Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, and ² Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Visual stimulation outside the classical receptive field can have pronounced effects on cat retinal ganglion cells. We characterized the effects of such stimulation by varying the contrast, spatial frequency, temporal frequency, and spatial extent of remote drifting sinusoidal gratings. We found that the mean firing rate of some X-cells and most Y-cells increased to remote gratings of low spatial frequency and high temporal frequency and decreased to ones of high spatial frequency and low temporal frequency. At least 10-20% contrast was required to see either effect, which quickly saturated at higher contrasts. Both effects were substantial, raising or lowering the mean rate of some cells by over 40 impulses/sec. Classical receptive field mechanisms were not involved because the remote gratings caused little or no response modulation. We conclude that, in addition to a mean-increasing mechanism known from previous work, a mean-decreasing one operates in the cat retina. This mechanism prefers slower motion and resolves finer patterns than the mean-increasing one. We incorporate these findings into a model consisting of pools of small and large rectifying subunits of opposite polarity. Model estimates of subunit radius were primarily independent of eccentricity and averaged ~0.15 and ~0.60° for the mean-decreasing and mean-increasing mechanisms, respectively. This makes the subunits approximately the center size of central X- and Y-cells. Because smooth movements of the eyes, head, or body should engage these mechanisms under natural conditions, we propose that the mean rate changes that would ensue are functionally relevant to cat vision.

Key words: cat; X- and Y-cells; receptive field; nonlinear subunits; contrast gain control; shift effect; periphery effect; maintained discharge

---

Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/01/21155794-10$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Camp, C. Tailby, and S. G. Solomon Adaptable Mechanisms That Regulate the Contrast Response of Neurons in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 5009 - 5021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Passaglia, D. K. Freeman, and J. B. Troy Effects of Remote Stimulation on the Modulated Activity of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2467 - 2476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Crook, B. B. Peterson, O. S. Packer, F. R. Robinson, J. B. Troy, and D. M. Dacey Y-Cell Receptive Field and Collicular Projection of Parasol Ganglion Cells in Macaque Monkey Retina J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11277 - 11291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Zaghloul, M. B. Manookin, B. G. Borghuis, K. Boahen, and J. B. Demb Functional Circuitry for Peripheral Suppression in Mammalian Y-Type Retinal Ganglion Cells J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4327 - 4340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Solomon, B. B. Lee, and H. Sun Suppressive surrounds and contrast gain in magnocellular-pathway retinal ganglion cells of macaque. J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8715 - 8726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10844 - 10856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. McMahon, O. S. Packer, and D. M. Dacey The Classical Receptive Field Surround of Primate Parasol Ganglion Cells Is Mediated Primarily by a Non-GABAergic Pathway J. Neurosci., April 14, 2004; 24(15): 3736 - 3745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Zaghloul, K. Boahen, and J. B. Demb Different Circuits for ON and OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells Cause Different Contrast Sensitivities J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2645 - 2654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Hennig, K. Funke, and F. Worgotter The Influence of Different Retinal Subcircuits on the Nonlinearity of Ganglion Cell Behavior J. Neurosci., October 1, 2002; 22(19): 8726 - 8738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Demb, K. Zaghloul, L. Haarsma, and P. Sterling Bipolar Cells Contribute to Nonlinear Spatial Summation in the Brisk-Transient (Y) Ganglion Cell in Mammalian Retina J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7447 - 7454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help