WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, B. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2001, 21(18):7293-7302

Responses of Macaque V1 Neurons to Binocular Orientation Differences

Holly Bridge1 and Bruce G. Cumming2

1 University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom, and 2 Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4435

Interocular differences in orientation occur during binocular viewing of a surface slanted in depth. These orientation disparities could be exploited by the visual system to provide information about surface slant, but gradients of positional disparity provide an equally effective means to the same end. We examined the encoding of orientation disparities in V1 neurons that were recorded from two awake fixating monkeys. Monocular orientation selectivity was measured separately in each eye. Although the preferred monocular orientation in the left and right eyes was highly correlated (r = 0.98), 19 of 61 cells showed a significant interocular difference in preferred orientation (IDPO). By itself, an IDPO does not imply a specific binocular selectivity for orientation differences. We therefore examined the response to 25 binocular combinations of orientations by pairing each of five orientations in one eye with five in the other. Forty-four of 64 neurons showed responses that reflected the monocular orientation tuning selectivity; the preferred orientation disparity changed when the monocular orientation was changed in either eye. The remaining third (20 of 64) responded to a consistent orientation disparity in a way that was not simply predictable from monocular orientation selectivity. However, nearly all of these neurons were selective for positional disparity, and several characteristics of the responses suggest that the apparent selectivity for orientation disparities was just a consequence of the positional disparity sensitivity. Neither the data presented here nor previous data from the cat (Blakemore et al., 1972; Nelson et al., 1977) support the idea that a population of neurons early in the visual system has a separate encoding scheme for orientation disparities.

Key words: orientation disparity; positional disparity; energy model; cortical area V1; awake macaque; electrophysiology


Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/01/21187293-10$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. M. Sanada and I. Ohzawa
Encoding of Three-Dimensional Surface Slant in Cat Visual Areas 17 and 18
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2768 - 2786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming
Effect of Interocular Delay on Disparity-Selective V1 Neurons: Relationship to Stereoacuity and the Pulfrich Effect
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1541 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Nienborg, H. Bridge, A. J. Parker, and B. G. Cumming
Receptive Field Size in V1 Neurons Limits Acuity for Perceiving Disparity Modulation
J. Neurosci., March 3, 2004; 24(9): 2065 - 2076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming
Testing Quantitative Models of Binocular Disparity Selectivity in Primary Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 2795 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Kagan, M. Gur, and D. M. Snodderly
Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of V1 Neurons of Alert Monkeys: Comparison With Responses to Gratings
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2557 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-