WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Bioscience Neurolucida
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimo, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hikosaka, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimo, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hikosaka, O.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1, 2001, 21(19):7804-7814

Role of Tonically Active Neurons in Primate Caudate in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement

Yasushi Shimo and Okihide Hikosaka

Department of Physiology, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan

Recent studies have suggested that the basal ganglia are essential for reward-oriented behavior. A popular proposal is that the interaction between sensorimotor and reward-related signals occurs in the striatal projection neurons. However, the role of interneurons remains unclear. Using the one-direction-rewarded version of the memory-guided saccade task (1DR), we examined the activity of tonically active neurons (TANs), presumed cholinergic interneurons, in the caudate. Many TANs (73/155, 47.1%) responded, usually with a pause, to a visual cue that indicated both the saccade goal and the presence or absence of reward. For most TANs (44/73, 60.3%), the response was spatially selective (contralateral dominant), but was not modulated by the reward significance. TANs are thus distinct from caudate projection neurons, which have responses to the cue that are both spatially selective and reward contingent, and from midbrain dopamine neurons, which have cue responses that are spatially nonselective and reward contingent. TANs were nonetheless sensitive to the reward schedule: in the all-directions-rewarded version (ADR) compared with 1DR, the cue responses of TANs were smaller, less frequent, and less spatially selective. In 1DR, it would first be detected that reward is not given regularly, and this process would then promote discrimination of individual stimuli in relation to reward. We propose that TANs would contribute to the detection of the context that requires discrimination, whereas dopamine neurons would contribute to the stimulus discrimination. These features of TANs might be explained by their cytoarchitecture, namely, as large aspiny neurons.

Key words: tonically active neurons; caudate nucleus; motivation; monkey; saccade; basal ganglia


Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/01/21197804-11$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Ravel, P. Sardo, E. Legallet, and P. Apicella
Influence of Spatial Information on Responses of Tonically Active Neurons in the Monkey Striatum
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2975 - 2986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Yamada, N. Matsumoto, and M. Kimura
Tonically Active Neurons in the Primate Caudate Nucleus and Putamen Differentially Encode Instructed Motivational Outcomes of Action
J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3500 - 3510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. F. Zink, G. Pagnoni, M. E. Martin, M. Dhamala, and G. S. Berns
Human Striatal Response to Salient Nonrewarding Stimuli
J. Neurosci., September 3, 2003; 23(22): 8092 - 8097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. T. Wyder, D. P. Massoglia, and T. R. Stanford
Quantitative Assessment of the Timing and Tuning of Visual-Related, Saccade-Related, and Delay Period Activity in Primate Central Thalamus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 2029 - 2052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Coe, K. Tomihara, M. Matsuzawa, and O. Hikosaka
Visual and Anticipatory Bias in Three Cortical Eye Fields of the Monkey during an Adaptive Decision-Making Task
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 5081 - 5090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Minamimoto and M. Kimura
Participation of the Thalamic CM-Pf Complex in Attentional Orienting
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 3090 - 3101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Sato and O. Hikosaka
Role of Primate Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 2363 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Takikawa, R. Kawagoe, and O. Hikosaka
Reward-Dependent Spatial Selectivity of Anticipatory Activity in Monkey Caudate Neurons
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 508 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-