QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (46) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Machens, C. K. Articles by Herz, A. V. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Machens, C. K. Articles by Herz, A. V. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2001, 21(9):3215-3227

Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by Insect Auditory Receptor Neurons

Christian K. Machens^{1, 2}, Martin B. Stemmler^{1, 2}, Petra Prinz², Rüdiger Krahe², Bernhard Ronacher^{1, 2}, and Andreas V. M. Herz^{1, 2}

¹ Innovationskolleg Theoretische Biologie, ² Institut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany

Despite their simple auditory systems, some insect species recognize certain temporal aspects of acoustic stimuli with an acuity equal to that of vertebrates; however, the underlying neural mechanisms and coding schemes are only partially understood. In this study, we analyze the response characteristics of the peripheral auditory system of grasshoppers with special emphasis on the representation of species-specific communication signals. We use both natural calling songs and artificial random stimuli designed to focus on two low-order statistical properties of the songs: their typical time scales and the distribution of their modulation amplitudes.

Based on stimulus reconstruction techniques and quantified within an information-theoretic framework, our data show that artificial stimuli with typical time scales of >40 msec can be read from single spike trains with high accuracy. Faster stimulus variations can be reconstructed only for behaviorally relevant amplitude distributions. The highest rates of information transmission (180 bits/sec) and the highest coding efficiencies (40%) are obtained for stimuli that capture both the time scales and amplitude distributions of natural songs.

Use of multiple spike trains significantly improves the reconstruction of stimuli that vary on time scales <40 msec or feature amplitude distributions as occur when several grasshopper songs overlap. Signal-to-noise ratios obtained from the reconstructions of natural songs do not exceed those obtained from artificial stimuli with the same low-order statistical properties. We conclude that auditory receptor neurons are optimized to extract both the time scales and the amplitude distribution of natural songs. They are not optimized, however, to extract higher-order statistical properties of the song-specific rhythmic patterns.

Key words: auditory receptor; neural coding; acoustic communication; natural stimuli; stimulus reconstruction; insect

---

Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/01/2193215-13$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Okada and M. Sakuma An Odor Stimulator Controlling Odor Temporal Pattern Applicable in Insect Olfaction Study Chem Senses, June 1, 2009; 34(5): 425 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Creutzig, S. Wohlgemuth, A. Stumpner, J. Benda, B. Ronacher, and A. V. M. Herz Timescale-Invariant Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by a Bursting Neuron J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2575 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Vogel and B. Ronacher Neural Correlations Increase Between Consecutive Processing Levels in the Auditory System of Locusts J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3376 - 3385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wohlgemuth and B. Ronacher Auditory Discrimination of Amplitude Modulations Based on Metric Distances of Spike Trains J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3082 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M Phelps Sensory ecology and perceptual allocation: new prospects for neural networks Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2007; 362(1479): 355 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Sadeghi, M. J. Chacron, M. C. Taylor, and K. E. Cullen Neural Variability, Detection Thresholds, and Information Transmission in the Vestibular System J. Neurosci., January 24, 2007; 27(4): 771 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rokem, S. Watzl, T. Gollisch, M. Stemmler, A. V. M. Herz, and I. Samengo Spike-Timing Precision Underlies the Coding Efficiency of Auditory Receptor Neurons J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2541 - 2552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. N. Woolley, P. R. Gill, and F. E. Theunissen Stimulus-Dependent Auditory Tuning Results in Synchronous Population Coding of Vocalizations in the Songbird Midbrain J. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 26(9): 2499 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Marsat and G. S. Pollack Effect of the Temporal Pattern of Contralateral Inhibition on Sound Localization Cues J. Neurosci., June 29, 2005; 25(26): 6137 - 6144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Chacron, L. Maler, and J. Bastian Feedback and Feedforward Control of Frequency Tuning to Naturalistic Stimuli J. Neurosci., June 8, 2005; 25(23): 5521 - 5532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Schaette, T. Gollisch, and A. V. M. Herz Spike-Train Variability of Auditory Neurons In Vivo: Dynamic Responses Follow Predictions From Constant Stimuli J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3270 - 3281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Vogel, R. M. Hennig, and B. Ronacher Increase of Neuronal Response Variability at Higher Processing Levels as Revealed by Simultaneous Recordings J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3548 - 3559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Latham and S. Nirenberg Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes, Revisited J. Neurosci., May 25, 2005; 25(21): 5195 - 5206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hsu, S. M. N. Woolley, T. E. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen Modulation Power and Phase Spectrum of Natural Sounds Enhance Neural Encoding Performed by Single Auditory Neurons J. Neurosci., October 13, 2004; 24(41): 9201 - 9211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Gollisch and A. V. M. Herz Input-Driven Components of Spike-Frequency Adaptation Can Be Unmasked In Vivo J. Neurosci., August 25, 2004; 24(34): 7435 - 7444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Marsat and G. S. Pollack Differential Temporal Coding of Rhythmically Diverse Acoustic Signals by a Single Interneuron J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 939 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Gollisch, H. Schutze, J. Benda, and A. V. M. Herz Energy Integration Describes Sound-Intensity Coding in an Insect Auditory System J. Neurosci., December 1, 2002; 22(23): 10434 - 10448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Krahe, G. Kreiman, F. Gabbiani, C. Koch, and W. Metzner Stimulus Encoding and Feature Extraction by Multiple Sensory Neurons J. Neurosci., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 2374 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help