 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1, 2002, 22(11):4577-4590
Receptive Field Organization Determines Pyramidal Cell Stimulus-Encoding Capability and Spatial Stimulus Selectivity
Joseph Bastian1, Maurice J. Chacron2, 3, and Leonard Maler2 1 Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, and Departments of 2 Cellular and Molecular Medicine and 3 Physics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5 Canada
Sensory systems must operate over a wide range of spatial scales, and single neuron receptive field (RF) organization may contribute to the ability of a neuron to encode information about stimuli having different spatial characteristics. Here we relate the RF organization of sensory neurons to their ability to encode time-varying stimuli, using linear stimulus estimation, measures of information transfer, and more conventional analysis techniques. The electrosensory systems of weakly electric fish are recognized as very tractable model systems for studies of sensory processing because behaviorally relevant stimuli are generated easily and related to known behaviors and because a detailed anatomical database is available to guide the design and interpretation of experiments. Receptive fields of neurons within the first central electrosensory-processing region have an antagonistic center-surround organization; the RF area varies with cell type, with dendritic morphology, and with the spontaneous activity patterns of the cell. Functional consequences of variations in center-surround organization were assessed by comparing responses to two spatial stimulus patterns that mimic naturalistic stimuli and that provide input to the center alone or to the center plus surround. Measures of the quality of stimulus estimation (coding fraction) and information transmission (mutual information) as well as traditional measures of responsiveness consistently demonstrate that, for cells having large surrounds, the activation of both receptive field components degrades the ability to encode time-varying stimuli. The loss of coding efficiency with center-surround stimulation probably results from cancellation of balanced excitatory and inhibitory inputs. However, cells with small surrounds relative to centers perform well under all spatial stimulus regimes.
Key words: electroreception; electrolocation; electrocommunication; information theory; neural coding; pyramidal cells; stimulus reconstruction; receptive fields
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/22114577-14$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
N. Toporikova and M. J. Chacron
SK Channels Gate Information Processing In Vivo by Regulating an Intrinsic Bursting Mechanism Seen In Vitro
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2273 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
G. Marsat, R. D. Proville, and L. Maler
Transient Signals Trigger Synchronous Bursts in an Identified Population of Neurons
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 714 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. Krahe, J. Bastian, and M. J. Chacron
Temporal Processing Across Multiple Topographic Maps in the Electrosensory System
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 852 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. J. Chacron and J. Bastian
Population Coding by Electrosensory Neurons
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1825 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. D. Ellis, R. Krahe, C. W. Bourque, R. J. Dunn, and M. J. Chacron
Muscarinic Receptors Control Frequency Tuning Through the Downregulation of an A-Type Potassium Current
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1526 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. D. Ellis, W. H. Mehaffey, E. Harvey-Girard, R. W. Turner, L. Maler, and R. J. Dunn
SK Channels Provide a Novel Mechanism for the Control of Frequency Tuning in Electrosensory Neurons
J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9491 - 9502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A.-M. M. Oswald, B. Doiron, and L. Maler
Interval Coding. I. Burst Interspike Intervals as Indicators of Stimulus Intensity
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2731 - 2743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. Doiron, A.-M. M. Oswald, and L. Maler
Interval Coding. II. Dendrite-Dependent Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2744 - 2757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. Gussin, J. Benda, and L. Maler
Limits of Linear Rate Coding of Dynamic Stimuli by Electroreceptor Afferents
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2917 - 2929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. W. Middleton, A. Longtin, J. Benda, and L. Maler
The cellular basis for parallel neural transmission of a high-frequency stimulus and its low-frequency envelope
PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14596 - 14601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. A. Carlson and M. Kawasaki
Ambiguous Encoding of Stimuli by Primary Sensory Afferents Causes a Lack of Independence in the Perception of Multiple Stimulus Attributes
J. Neurosci., September 6, 2006; 26(36): 9173 - 9183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. J. Chacron
Nonlinear Information Processing in a Model Sensory System
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2933 - 2946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. Engelmann, J. Bacelo, E. van den Burg, and K. Grant
Sensory and Motor Effects of Etomidate Anesthesia
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1231 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. J. Chacron, L. Maler, and J. Bastian
Feedback and Feedforward Control of Frequency Tuning to Naturalistic Stimuli
J. Neurosci., June 8, 2005; 25(23): 5521 - 5532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A.-M. M. Oswald, M. J. Chacron, B. Doiron, J. Bastian, and L. Maler
Parallel Processing of Sensory Input by Bursts and Isolated Spikes
J. Neurosci., May 5, 2004; 24(18): 4351 - 4362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. Doiron, L. Noonan, N. Lemon, and R. W. Turner
Persistent Na+ Current Modifies Burst Discharge By Regulating Conditional Backpropagation of Dendritic Spikes
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 324 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|