WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anisman, H.
Right arrow Articles by McIntyre, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anisman, H.
Right arrow Articles by McIntyre, D. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
*Epilepsy

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1, 2002, 22(17):7809-7817

Conceptual, Spatial, and Cue Learning in the Morris Water Maze in Fast or Slow Kindling Rats: Attention Deficit Comorbidity

Hymie Anisman and Dan C. McIntyre

Institute of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1S 5B6

Rat lines selectively bred for differences in amygdala excitability, manifested by "fast" or "slow" kindling epileptogenesis, display several comorbid features related to anxiety and learning. To assess the nature of the learning deficits in fast kindling rats, performance was evaluated in several variants of a Morris water-maze test. Regardless of whether the location of the platform was fixed or varied over days (matching-to-place task), the fast rats displayed inferior performance, suggesting both working and reference memory impairments. Furthermore, when the position of the platform was altered after the response was acquired, fast rats were more persistent in emitting the previously acquired response. The poor performance of fast rats was also evident in both cued and uncued tasks, indicating that their disturbed learning was not simply a reflection of a spatial deficit. Moreover, fast rats could be easily distracted by irrelevant cues, suggesting that these animals suffered from an attentional disturbance. Interestingly, when rats received several training trials with the platform elevated, permitting them to develop the concept of facile escape, the performance of fast rats improved greatly. The performance disturbance in fast rats may reflect difficulties in forming a conceptual framework under conditions involving some degree of ambiguity, as well as greater distractibility by irrelevant cues. These various attributes of the fast rats may serve as a potentially useful animal model of disorders characterized by an attention deficit.

Key words: seizure susceptibility; genetic differences; spatial learning; cued learning; concept formation; attention

Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/02/22177809-09$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BrainHome page
B. Hermann, J. Jones, K. Dabbs, C. A. Allen, R. Sheth, J. Fine, A. McMillan, and M. Seidenberg
The frequency, complications and aetiology of ADHD in new onset paediatric epilepsy
Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3135 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help
-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-