 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2002, 22(18):8297-8304
Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery
Brandon
Rohrer1,
Susan
Fasoli1,
Hermano Igo
Krebs1,
Richard
Hughes3,
Bruce
Volpe4,
Walter R.
Frontera3,
Joel
Stein3, and
Neville
Hogan1, 2
Departments of 1 Mechanical Engineering and
2 Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, 3 Spaulding
Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, and
4 Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical
College of Cornell University, Burke Medical Research Institute, White
Plains, New York 10605
Smoothness is characteristic of coordinated human movements, and
stroke patients' movements seem to grow more smooth with recovery. We
used a robotic therapy device to analyze five different measures of
movement smoothness in the hemiparetic arm of 31 patients recovering
from stroke. Four of the five metrics showed general increases in
smoothness for the entire patient population. However, according to the
fifth metric, the movements of patients with recent stroke grew less
smooth over the course of therapy. This pattern was reproduced in a
computer simulation of recovery based on submovement blending,
suggesting that progressive blending of submovements underlies stroke recovery.
Key words:
stroke recovery; submovements; smoothness; segmentation; robotic therapy; minimum-jerk; blending
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/22188297-08$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Casadio, P. Giannoni, P. Morasso, and V. Sanguineti
A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
217 - 228.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards
Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
78 - 91.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Goble and S. H. Brown
Upper Limb Asymmetries in the Matching of Proprioceptive Versus Visual Targets
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2008;
99(6):
3063 - 3074.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M Wagner, J. A Rhodes, and C. Patten
Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke
Physical Therapy,
May 1, 2008;
88(5):
652 - 663.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Colombo, F. Pisano, S. Micera, A. Mazzone, C. Delconte, M.C. Carrozza, P. Dario, and G. Minuco
Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
February 1, 2008;
22(1):
50 - 63.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Dipietro, H. I. Krebs, S. E. Fasoli, B. T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever, and N. Hogan
Changing Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2007;
98(2):
757 - 768.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Takahashi, D. Nemet, C. M. Rose-Gottron, J. K. Larson, D. M. Cooper, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer
Effect of muscle fatigue on internal model formation and retention during reaching with the arm
J Appl Physiol,
February 1, 2006;
100(2):
695 - 706.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Zackowski, A. W. Dromerick, S. A. Sahrmann, W. T. Thach, and A. J. Bastian
How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis?
Brain,
May 1, 2004;
127(5):
1035 - 1046.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|