QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hennig, M. H. Articles by Wörgötter, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hennig, M. H. Articles by Wörgötter, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1, 2002, 22(19):8726-8738

The Influence of Different Retinal Subcircuits on the Nonlinearity of Ganglion Cell Behavior

Matthias H. Hennig¹, Klaus Funke², and Florentin Wörgötter¹

¹ Institute for Neuronal Computational Intelligence and Technology, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom, and ² Institut für Physiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany

Y-type retinal ganglion cells show a pronounced, nonlinear, frequency-doubling behavior in response to modulated sinewave gratings. This is not observed in X-type cells. The source of this spatial nonlinear summation is still under debate. We have designed a realistic biophysical model of the cat retina to test the influence of different retinal cell classes and subcircuits on the linearity of ganglion cell responses. The intraretinal connectivity consists of the fundamental feedforward pathway via bipolar cells, lateral horizontal cell connectivity, and two amacrine circuits. The wiring diagram of X- and Y-cells is identical apart from two aspects: (1) Y-cells have a wider receptive field and (2) they receive input from a nested amacrine circuit consisting of narrow- and wide-field amacrine cells. The model was tested with contrast-reversed gratings. First and second harmonic response components were determined to estimate the degree of nonlinearity. By means of circuit dissection, we found that a high degree of the Y-cell nonlinear behavior arises from the spatial integration of temporal photoreceptor nonlinearities. Furthermore, we found a weaker and less uniform influence of the nested amacrine circuit. Different sources of nonlinearities interact in a multiplicative manner, and the influence of the amacrine circuit is ~25% weaker than that of the photoreceptor. The model predicts that significant nonlinearities occur already at the level of horizontal cell responses. Pharmacological inactivation of the amacrine circuit is expected to exert a milder effect in reducing ganglion cell nonlinearity.

Key words: receptive field; rectification; ganglion cell; amacrine cell; cat retina; model

---

Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/02/22198726-13$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. L. Passaglia, D. K. Freeman, and J. B. Troy Effects of Remote Stimulation on the Modulated Activity of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2467 - 2476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Greschner, A. Thiel, J. Kretzberg, and J. Ammermuller Complex Spike-Event Pattern of Transient ON-OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2845 - 2856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Chacron Nonlinear Information Processing in a Model Sensory System J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2933 - 2946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help