WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hateren, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Hateren, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 15, 2002, 22(22):9945-9960

Processing of Natural Temporal Stimuli by Macaque Retinal Ganglion Cells

J. H. van Hateren1, L. Rüttiger2, 3, H. Sun4, and B. B. Lee2, 4

1 Department of Neurobiophysics, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands, 2 Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany, 3 Tübingen Hearing Research Center, University Clinics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, and 4 State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York 10036

This study quantifies the performance of primate retinal ganglion cells in response to natural stimuli. Stimuli were confined to the temporal and chromatic domains and were derived from two contrasting environments, one typically northern European and the other a flower show. The performance of the cells was evaluated by investigating variability of cell responses to repeated stimulus presentations and by comparing measured to model responses. Both analyses yielded a quantity called the coherence rate (in bits per second), which is related to the information rate. Magnocellular (MC) cells yielded coherence rates of up to 100 bits/sec, rates of parvocellular (PC) cells were much lower, and short wavelength (S)-cone-driven ganglion cells yielded intermediate rates. The modeling approach showed that for MC cells, coherence rates were generated almost exclusively by the luminance content of the stimulus. Coherence rates of PC cells were also dominated by achromatic content. This is a consequence of the stimulus structure; luminance varied much more in the natural environment than chromaticity. Only approximately one-sixth of the coherence rate of the PC cells derived from chromatic content, and it was dominated by frequencies below 10 Hz. S-cone-driven ganglion cells also yielded coherence rates dominated by low frequencies. Below 2-3 Hz, PC cell signals contained more power than those of MC cells. Response variation between individual ganglion cells of a particular class was analyzed by constructing generic cells, the properties of which may be relevant for performance higher in the visual system. The approach used here helps define retinal modules useful for studies of higher visual processing of natural stimuli.

Key words: retinal ganglion cells; magnocellular; parvocellular; natural stimuli; information theory; macaque


Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/02/22229945-16$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Z. Tan and H. Yao
The Spatiotemporal Frequency Tuning of LGN Receptive Field Facilitates Neural Discrimination of Natural Stimuli
J. Neurosci., September 9, 2009; 29(36): 11409 - 11416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. C. Sincich, J. C. Horton, and T. O. Sharpee
Preserving Information in Neural Transmission
J. Neurosci., May 13, 2009; 29(19): 6207 - 6216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Greschner, A. Thiel, J. Kretzberg, and J. Ammermuller
Complex Spike-Event Pattern of Transient ON-OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2845 - 2856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Karmeier, J. H. van Hateren, R. Kern, and M. Egelhaaf
Encoding of Naturalistic Optic Flow by a Population of Blowfly Motion-Sensitive Neurons
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1602 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust
Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does?
J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
D Osorio and M Vorobyev
Photoreceptor sectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision
Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2005; 272(1574): 1745 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Heitwerth, R. Kern, J. H. van Hateren, and M. Egelhaaf
Motion Adaptation Leads to Parsimonious Encoding of Natural Optic Flow by Blowfly Motion Vision System
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1761 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. P. Lindemann, R. Kern, J. H. van Hateren, H. Ritter, and M. Egelhaaf
On the Computations Analyzing Natural Optic Flow: Quantitative Model Analysis of the Blowfly Motion Vision Pathway
J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6435 - 6448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. H. van Hateren, R. Kern, G. Schwerdtfeger, and M. Egelhaaf
Function and Coding in the Blowfly H1 Neuron during Naturalistic Optic Flow
J. Neurosci., April 27, 2005; 25(17): 4343 - 4352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. A. Lesica and G. B. Stanley
Encoding of Natural Scene Movies by Tonic and Burst Spikes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., November 24, 2004; 24(47): 10731 - 10740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. B. Demb, P. Sterling, and M. A. Freed
How Retinal Ganglion Cells Prevent Synaptic Noise From Reaching the Spike Output
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2510 - 2519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. L. Passaglia and J. B. Troy
Information Transmission Rates of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1217 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
M. Juusola and G. G. de Polavieja
The Rate of Information Transfer of Naturalistic Stimulation by Graded Potentials
J. Gen. Physiol., July 28, 2003; 122(2): 191 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. A. Zaghloul, K. Boahen, and J. B. Demb
Different Circuits for ON and OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells Cause Different Contrast Sensitivities
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2645 - 2654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-