QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marie, B. Articles by Blagburn, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marie, B. Articles by Blagburn, J. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, February 1, 2002, 22(3):832-841

Persistent engrailed Expression Is Required to Determine Sensory Axon Trajectory, Branching, and Target Choice

Bruno Marie¹, Lillian Cruz-Orengo², and Jonathan M. Blagburn^{1, 2}

¹ Institute of Neurobiology and ² Department of Physiology, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901

The transcription factor Engrailed (En) directs, in the cockroach cercal system, the shape of the axonal arborization and the choice of postsynaptic partners of an identified sensory neuron (6m). Knock-out of En using double-stranded RNA interference transforms 6m so that it resembles a neighboring neuron that normally does not express the en gene, has a different arbor anatomy, and makes different connections. We characterized the development of 6m and perturbed en expression at different stages. Our results show that En is not required before birth for 6m to become a neuron, but that it is required in the postmitotic neuron to control axonal arborization and synaptic specificity. Knock-out of En after 6m has entered the CNS does not change the axonal trajectory and has minor effects on axonal branches but causes the formation of synaptic connections typical of an En-negative cell. This suggests that En controls target recognition molecules independently from those guiding the axon. In contrast, double-stranded RNA injection 1 d later does not have any effects on the phenotype of 6m, suggesting that the period of synapse formation is over by the time En levels have fallen or, if synapse turnover occurs, that En is not required to maintain the specificity of synaptic connections. We conclude that persistent en expression is required to determine successive stages in the differentiation of the neuron, suggesting that it is not far upstream from those genes encoding axon guidance and synaptic recognition molecules.

Key words: Engrailed; RNA interference; mechanosensory; homeodomain; synaptic specificity; axon guidance

---

Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/02/223832-10$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Alberi, P. Sgado, and H. H. Simon Engrailed genes are cell-autonomously required to prevent apoptosis in mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons Development, July 1, 2004; 131(13): 3229 - 3236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sapir, E. J. Geiman, Z. Wang, T. Velasquez, S. Mitsui, Y. Yoshihara, E. Frank, F. J. Alvarez, and M. Goulding Pax6 and Engrailed 1 Regulate Two Distinct Aspects of Renshaw Cell Development J. Neurosci., February 4, 2004; 24(5): 1255 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Marie and J. M. Blagburn Differential Roles of Engrailed Paralogs in Determining Sensory Axon Guidance and Synaptic Target Recognition J. Neurosci., August 27, 2003; 23(21): 7854 - 7862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help