WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahum-Levy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Benveniste, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahum-Levy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Benveniste, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2002, 22(7):2550-2560

Glutamate But Not Glycine Agonist Affinity for NMDA Receptors Is Influenced by Small Cations

Rinat Nahum-Levy*, Eyal Tam*, Sara Shavit, and Morris Benveniste

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel

NMDA receptor currents desensitize in an agonist-dependent manner when either the glutamate or glycine agonist is subsaturating. This may result from a conformational change in the NMDA receptor protein that lowers glutamate and glycine binding site affinity induced by co-agonist binding, channel opening, or ion permeation. We have used whole-cell voltage clamp of cultured hippocampal neurons with agonist paired-pulse protocols to demonstrate that glutamate and glycine dissociate 7.9- and 6.8-fold slower in the absence of their respective co-agonists than when their co-agonists are present. Paired-pulse and desensitization protocols were used to show that co-agonist binding and channel opening are sufficient to cause a reduction in glycine affinity, but extracellular sodium or magnesium binding was required in addition to conformational changes leading to channel opening to reduce glutamate binding-site affinity. Use of cesium or potassium as the major extracellular cation prevented the reduction of glutamate affinity. In addition, the use of choline-, sodium-, or cesium-based intracellular solutions did not alter desensitization characteristics, indicating that the site responsible for reduction of glutamate affinity is not in the intracellular domain. The fact that the reduction of glutamate affinity is dependent on certain small extracellular cations whereas the reduction of glycine affinity is insensitive to such cations indicates that conformational changes induced by the binding of glutamate are not completely paralleled by the conformational changes induced by glycine. Although glutamate and glycine are essential co-agonists, these data suggest that they have differential roles in the process of NMDA receptor activation.

Key words: glutamate; glycine; NMDA receptor; ion permeation; desensitization; channel gating; channel activation

* R.N.-L. and E.T. contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/02/2272550-11$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. S. Basile, A. Janowsky, K. Golembiowska, M. Kowalska, E. Tam, M. Benveniste, P. Popik, A. Nikiforuk, M. Krawczyk, G. Nowak, et al.
Characterization of the Antinociceptive Actions of Bicifadine in Models of Acute, Persistent, and Chronic Pain
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 1208 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help
-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-