QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1, 2003, 23(11):4746-4759

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (33) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smyth, D. Articles by Tolhurst, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smyth, D. Articles by Tolhurst, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Receptive-Field Organization of Simple Cells in Primary Visual Cortex of Ferrets under Natural Scene Stimulation

Darragh Smyth,¹ Ben Willmore,² Gary E. Baker,¹ Ian D. Thompson,¹ and David J. Tolhurst²

¹ Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom, and ² Department of Physiology, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom

The responses of simple cells in primary visual cortex to sinusoidal gratings can primarily be predicted from their spatial receptive fields, as mapped using spots or bars. Although this quasilinearity is well documented, it is not clear whether it holds for complex natural stimuli. We recorded from simple cells in the primary visual cortex of anesthetized ferrets while stimulating with flashed digitized photographs of natural scenes. We applied standard reverse-correlation methods to quantify the average natural stimulus that invokes a neuronal response. Although these maps cannot be the receptive fields, we find that they still predict the preferred orientation of grating for each cell very well (r = 0.91); they do not predict the spatial-frequency tuning. Using a novel application of the linear reconstruction method called regularized pseudoinverse, we were able to recover high-resolution receptive-field maps from the responses to a relatively small number of natural scenes. These receptive-field maps not only predict the optimum orientation of each cell (r = 0.96) but also the spatial-frequency optimum (r = 0.89); the maps also predict the tuning bandwidths of many cells. Therefore, our first conclusion is that the tuning preferences of the cells are primarily linear and constant across stimulus type. However, when we used these maps to predict the actual responses of the cells to natural scenes, we did find evidence of expansive output nonlinearity and nonlinear influences from outside the classical receptive fields, orientation tuning, and spatial-frequency tuning.

Key words: receptive fields; visual cortex; simple cells; V1; area 17; natural scenes; natural images; reverse correlation; linearity; linear summation

---

Received Oct. 4, 2002; revised Mar. 4, 2003; accepted Mar. 13, 2003.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Willmore, R. J. Prenger, M. C.-K. Wu, and J. L. Gallant The Berkeley Wavelet Transform: A Biologically Inspired Orthogonal Wavelet Transform Neural Comput., June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1537 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. O. Sharpee, K. D. Miller, and M. P. Stryker On the Importance of Static Nonlinearity in Estimating Spatiotemporal Neural Filters With Natural Stimuli J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2496 - 2509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. MacEvoy, T. D. Hanks, and M. A. Paradiso Macaque V1 Activity During Natural Vision: Effects of Natural Scenes and Saccades J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 460 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Victor, F. Mechler, M. A. Repucci, K. P. Purpura, and T. Sharpee Responses of V1 Neurons to Two-Dimensional Hermite Functions J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 379 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Olshausen and D. J. Field How Close Are We to Understanding V1? Neural Comput., August 1, 2005; 17(8): 1665 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Paninski, J. W. Pillow, and E. P. Simoncelli Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Stochastic Integrate-and-Fire Neural Encoding Model Neural Comput., December 1, 2004; 16(12): 2533 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. V. David, W. E. Vinje, and J. L. Gallant Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons J. Neurosci., August 4, 2004; 24(31): 6991 - 7006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kayser, M. Kim, K. Ugurbil, D.-S. Kim, and P. Konig A Comparison of Hemodynamic and Neural Responses in Cat Visual Cortex Using Complex Stimuli Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2004; 14(8): 881 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. T. Yin Buried in the Noise. Focus on "Temporal Properties of Responses to Broadband Noise in the Auditory Nerve" J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 1934 - 1935. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Machens, M. S. Wehr, and A. M. Zador Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds J. Neurosci., February 4, 2004; 24(5): 1089 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sharpee, N. C. Rust, and W. Bialek Analyzing Neural Responses to Natural Signals: Maximally Informative Dimensions Neural Comput., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 223 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help