 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, July 30, 2003, 23(17):6936-6945
Previous Article | Next Article
Response to Contrast of Electrophysiologically Defined Cell Classes in Primary Visual Cortex
Diego Contreras andLarry Palmer Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
Information processing in the visual cortex is critically dependent on the input-output relationships of its component neurons. The transformation of synaptic inputs into spike trains depends in turn on the host of intrinsic membrane properties expressed by neurons, which define established electrophysiological cell classes in the neocortex. Here we studied, with intracellular recordings in vivo, how the electrophysiological cell classes in the primary visual cortex transform an increasing input, represented by stimulus contrast, into membrane depolarization and trains of action potentials. We used contrast as input because, regardless of their stimulus selectivity, primary visual cortical cells increase their firing rates in response to increases in luminance contrast. We found that both the spike rate response and the membrane potential response are best described by the hyperbolic ratio function when compared with linear, power, and logarithmic functions. In addition, both responses show similar parameter values and similar residual variance from the fits to all four functions. We also found that changes in membrane potential are similar, but firing rates differ strongly, between the established electrophysiological cell classes: fast spiking neurons show the highest firing rates, followed by fast rhythmic bursting, and regular spiking (RS) cells. In addition, among complex cells, RS cells from supragranular layers fired at higher rates than RS cells from infragranular layers. Finally, we show that the differences in firing rates between cell classes arise from differences in the slope of the relationship between membrane potential and spike rate.
Key words: contrast; visual cortex; intrinsic properties; intracellular; in vivo; simple; complex
Received Apr. 7, 2003; revised May. 29, 2003; accepted Jun. 6, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:
L. G. Nowak, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and D. A. McCormick
Lack of Orientation and Direction Selectivity in a Subgroup of Fast-Spiking Inhibitory Interneurons: Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms and Comparison with Other Electrophysiological Cell Types
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1058 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. Duong and R. D. Freeman
Contrast Sensitivity Is Enhanced by Expansive Nonlinear Processing in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
H. D. Lu and A. W. Roe
Optical Imaging of Contrast Response in Macaque Monkey V1 and V2
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2675 - 2695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. A. Cardin, L. A. Palmer, and D. Contreras
Stimulus Feature Selectivity in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10333 - 10344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. H. Higgs, S. J. Slee, and W. J. Spain
Diversity of gain modulation by noise in neocortical neurons: regulation by the slow afterhyperpolarization conductance.
J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8787 - 8799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J.-M. Alonso and H. A. Swadlow
Thalamocortical Specificity and the Synthesis of Sensory Cortical Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V. F. Descalzo, L. G. Nowak, J. C. Brumberg, D. A. McCormick, and M. V. Sanchez-Vives
Slow Adaptation in Fast-Spiking Neurons of Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1111 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|