WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 17, 2003, 23(24):8547-8557

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kara, P.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kara, P.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Efficacy of Retinal Spikes in Driving Cortical Responses

Prakash Kara and R. Clay Reid

Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

How does a single retinal ganglion cell (RGC) affect the firing of simple cells in the visual cortex? Although much is known of the functional connections between the retina and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and between LGN and visual cortex, it is hard to infer the effect of disynaptic connections from retina to visual cortex. Most importantly, there is considerable divergence from retina to LGN, so cortical neurons might be influenced by ganglion cells through multiple feedforward pathways. We recorded simultaneously from ganglion cells in the retina and cortical simple cells in the striate cortex with overlapping receptive fields and evaluated disynaptic connections with cross-correlation analysis. In all disynaptically connected pairs, the retinal receptive field center and overlapping cortical subregion always shared the same sign (either both ON or both OFF). Connected pairs were similar in other respects, such as relative position and timing of their receptive fields, and thus obeyed the same rules of connectivity found previously for retinothalamic and thalamocortical connections. We found that a single RGC directly contributed on average to ~3% of the activity of its cortical target. The relative timing of pairs of spikes from the retinal cell affected their efficacy in driving the cortical cell. When two retinal spikes were closely spaced (<10 msec), the second spike was several times more likely to drive the cortical target. The relative magnitude of this disynaptic paired spike enhancement was considerably larger than has been found previously for retinogeniculate and geniculocortical connections. The amplified paired spike enhancement from retina to cortex ensures that signal transmission from retina to cortex is particularly effective when the retina fires a series of closely spaced action potentials.

Key words: simple cells; retinal ganglion cells; area 17; temporal summation; paired spike enhancement; disynaptic connections; synaptic efficacy; JPSTH; overlapping receptive fields; cross-correlation


Received June 4, 2003; revised July 19, 2003; accepted July 21, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga
Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2158 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Gollisch and M. Meister
Rapid Neural Coding in the Retina with Relative Spike Latencies
Science, February 22, 2008; 319(5866): 1108 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. G. Weyand
Retinogeniculate Transmission in Wakefulness
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 769 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. J. Peissig, J. Singer, K. Kawasaki, and D. L. Sheinberg
Effects of Long-Term Object Familiarity on Event-Related Potentials in the Monkey
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1323 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Van Wart and G. Matthews
Impaired firing and cell-specific compensation in neurons lacking nav1.6 sodium channels.
J. Neurosci., July 5, 2006; 26(27): 7172 - 7180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Rosen and R. Mooney
Synaptic Interactions Underlying Song-Selectivity in the Avian Nucleus HVC Revealed by Dual Intracellular Recordings
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1158 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. R. Bartlett, E. A. DeYoe, R. W. Doty, B. B. Lee, J. D. Lewine, N. Negrao, and W. H. Overman Jr
Psychophysics of Electrical Stimulation of Striate Cortex in Macaques
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3430 - 3442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. A. DeYoe, J. D. Lewine, and R. W. Doty
Laminar Variation in Threshold for Detection of Electrical Excitation of Striate Cortex by Macaques
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3443 - 3450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Hill and G. Tononi
Modeling Sleep and Wakefulness in the Thalamocortical System
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1671 - 1698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Hayashida and A. T. Ishida
Dopamine Receptor Activation Can Reduce Voltage-Gated Na+ Current by Modulating Both Entry Into and Recovery From Inactivation
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 3134 - 3141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-