WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 2003, 23(28):9265-9275

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Angelaki, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Angelaki, D. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Resolution of Sensory Ambiguities for Gaze Stabilization Requires a Second Neural Integrator

Andrea M. Green and Dora E. Angelaki

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

The ability to simultaneously move in the world and maintain stable visual perception depends critically on the contribution of vestibulo-ocular reflexes (VORs) to gaze stabilization. It is traditionally believed that semicircular canal signals drive compensatory responses to rotational head disturbances (rotational VOR), whereas otolith signals compensate for translational movements [translational VOR (TVOR)]. However, a sensory ambiguity exists because otolith afferents are activated similarly during head translations and reorientations relative to gravity (i.e., tilts). Extra-otolith cues are, therefore, necessary to ensure that dynamic head tilts do not elicit a TVOR. To investigate how extra-otolith signals contribute, we characterized the temporal and viewing distance-dependent properties of a TVOR elicited in the absence of a lateral acceleration stimulus to the otoliths during combined translational/rotational motion. We show that, in addition to otolith signals, angular head position signals derived by integrating sensory canal information drive the TVOR. A physiological basis for these results is proposed in a model with two distinct integration steps. Upstream of the well known oculomotor velocity-to-position neural integrator, the model incorporates a separate integration element that could represent the "velocity storage integrator," whose functional role in the oculomotor system has so far remained controversial. We propose that a key functional purpose of the velocity storage network is to temporally integrate semicircular canal signals, so that they may be used to extract translation information from ambiguous otolith afferent signals in the natural and functionally relevant bandwidth of head movements.

Key words: eye movement; vestibular; oculomotor; sensorimotor; model; otolith; VOR; velocity storage


Received June 16, 2003; revised August 14, 2003; accepted August 15, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Liu and D. E. Angelaki
Vestibular Signals in Macaque Extrastriate Visual Cortex Are Functionally Appropriate for Heading Perception
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2009; 29(28): 8936 - 8945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. R. MacNeilage, N. Ganesan, and D. E. Angelaki
Computational Approaches to Spatial Orientation: From Transfer Functions to Dynamic Bayesian Inference
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 2981 - 2996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Yakusheva, P. M. Blazquez, and D. E. Angelaki
Frequency-Selective Coding of Translation and Tilt in Macaque Cerebellar Nodulus and Uvula
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 28(40): 9997 - 10009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. L. McArthur and J. D. Dickman
Canal and Otolith Contributions to Compensatory Tilt Responses in Pigeons
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1488 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. F. Lewis, C. Haburcakova, and D. M. Merfeld
Roll Tilt Psychophysics in Rhesus Monkeys During Vestibular and Visual Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 140 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R.A.A. Vingerhoets, J.A.M. Van Gisbergen, and W. P. Medendorp
Verticality Perception During Off-Vertical Axis Rotation
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3256 - 3268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. M. Green, H. Meng, and D. E. Angelaki
A Reevaluation of the Inverse Dynamic Model for Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., February 7, 2007; 27(6): 1346 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Zhou, B. F. Tang, S. D. Newlands, and W. M. King
Responses of Monkey Vestibular-Only Neurons to Translation and Angular Rotation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2915 - 2930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. M.F. Wong and J. A. Sharpe
Cerebellar skew deviation and the torsional vestibuloocular reflex
Neurology, August 9, 2005; 65(3): 412 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Merfeld, S. Park, C. Gianna-Poulin, F. O. Black, and S. Wood
Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. I. Frequency Response of VOR and Perceptual Responses During Translation and Tilt
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 186 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Merfeld, S. Park, C. Gianna-Poulin, F. O. Black, and S. Wood
Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. II. VOR and Perceptual Responses During Combined Tilt&Translation
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 199 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. J. M. Hess, K. Jaggi-Schwarz, and H. Misslisch
Canal-Otolith Interactions After Off-Vertical Axis Rotations. II. Spatiotemporal Properties of Roll and Pitch Postrotatory Vestibuloocular Reflexes
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1633 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Shaikh, F. F. Ghasia, J. D. Dickman, and D. E. Angelaki
Properties of Cerebellar Fastigial Neurons During Translation, Rotation, and Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 853 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. J. Peterka, C. C. Gianna-Poulin, L. H. Zupan, and D. M. Merfeld
Origin of Orientation-Dependent Asymmetries in Vestibulo-Ocular Reflexes Evoked by Caloric Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2333 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. M. Green and D. E. Angelaki
An Integrative Neural Network for Detecting Inertial Motion and Head Orientation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 905 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. E. Angelaki
Eyes on Target: What Neurons Must do for the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Linear Motion
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 20 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-