WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 5, 2003, 23(31):10040-10051

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Multiplicative Gain Changes Are Induced by Excitation or Inhibition Alone

Brendan K. Murphy1 and Kenneth D. Miller1,2

1Graduate Group in Biophysics, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, and 2Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444

We model the effects of excitation and inhibition on the gain of cortical neurons. Previous theoretical work has concluded that excitation or inhibition alone will not cause a multiplicative gain change in the curve of firing rate versus input current. However, such gain changes in vivo are measured in the curve of firing rate versus stimulus parameter. We find that when this curve is considered, and when the nonlinear relationships between stimulus parameter and input current and between input current and firing rate in vivo are taken into account, then simple excitation or inhibition alone can induce a multiplicative gain change. In particular, the power-law relationship between voltage and firing rate that is induced by neuronal noise is critical to this result. This suggests an unexpectedly simple mechanism that may underlie the gain modulations commonly observed in cortex. More generally, it suggests that a smaller input will multiplicatively modulate the gain of a larger one when both converge on a common cortical target.

Key words: multiplication; gain modulation; noise; power-law; cortex; tuning curve


Received April 25, 2003; revised September 10, 2003; accepted September 12, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. S. Chow, R. Romo, and C. D. Brody
Context-Dependent Modulation of Functional Connectivity: Secondary Somatosensory Cortex to Prefrontal Cortex Connections in Two-Stimulus-Interval Discrimination Tasks
J. Neurosci., June 3, 2009; 29(22): 7238 - 7245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Ayaz and F. S. Chance
Gain Modulation of Neuronal Responses by Subtractive and Divisive Mechanisms of Inhibition
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 958 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Cardin, L. A. Palmer, and D. Contreras
Stimulus Feature Selectivity in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10333 - 10344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel
Contrast Adaptation in a Nonadapting LGN Model
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1287 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Ardid, X.-J. Wang, and A. Compte
An Integrated Microcircuit Model of Attentional Processing in the Neocortex
J. Neurosci., August 8, 2007; 27(32): 8486 - 8495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Haider, A. Duque, A. R. Hasenstaub, Y. Yu, and D. A. McCormick
Enhancement of Visual Responsiveness by Spontaneous Local Network Activity In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4186 - 4202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. S. Chance
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis for Characterizing Synaptic Efficacy
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1799 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. H. Mehaffey, B. Doiron, L. Maler, and R. W. Turner
Deterministic Multiplicative Gain Control with Active Dendrites
J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9968 - 9977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-