 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 12, 2003, 23(32):10201-10213
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Different Roles for Simple-Cell and Complex-Cell Inhibition in V1
Thomas Z. Lauritzen1,4 and
Kenneth D. Miller1,2,3,4
1Graduate Group in Biophysics, 2Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, 3Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, and 4W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444
Previously, we proposed a model of the circuitry underlying simple-cell responses in cat primary visual cortex (V1) layer 4. We argued that the ordered arrangement of lateral geniculate nucleus inputs to a simple cell must be supplemented by a component of feedforward inhibition that is untuned for orientation and responds to high temporal frequencies to explain the sharp contrast-invariant orientation tuning and low-pass temporal frequency tuning of simple cells. The temporal tuning also requires a significant NMDA component in geniculocortical synapses. Recent experiments have revealed cat V1 layer 4 inhibitory neurons with two distinct types of receptive fields (RFs): complex RFs with mixed ON/OFF responses lacking in orientation tuning, and simple RFs with normal, sharp-orientation tuning (although, some respond to all orientations). We show that complex inhibitory neurons can provide the inhibition needed to explain simple-cell response properties. Given this complex cell inhibition, antiphase or "push-pull" inhibition from tuned simple inhibitory neurons acts to sharpen spatial frequency tuning, lower responses to low temporal frequency stimuli, and increase the stability of cortical activity.
Key words: visual cortex; contrast invariance; orientation tuning; simple cell; complex cell; V1; inhibition; push-pull; stability
Received May 27, 2003;
revised September 10, 2003;
accepted September 12, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Niell and M. P. Stryker
Highly Selective Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
July 23, 2008;
28(30):
7520 - 7536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Nowak, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and D. A. McCormick
Lack of Orientation and Direction Selectivity in a Subgroup of Fast-Spiking Inhibitory Interneurons: Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms and Comparison with Other Electrophysiological Cell Types
Cereb Cortex,
May 1, 2008;
18(5):
1058 - 1078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Van Hooser
Similarity and Diversity in Visual Cortex: Is There a Unifying Theory of Cortical Computation?
Neuroscientist,
December 1, 2007;
13(6):
639 - 656.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Cardin, L. A. Palmer, and D. Contreras
Stimulus Feature Selectivity in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
September 26, 2007;
27(39):
10333 - 10344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Palmer and K. D. Miller
Effects of Inhibitory Gain and Conductance Fluctuations in a Simple Model for Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat V1
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2007;
98(1):
63 - 78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Cleland, B. A. Johnson, M. Leon, and C. Linster
Relational representation in the olfactory system
PNAS,
February 6, 2007;
104(6):
1953 - 1958.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Allen and R. D. Freeman
Dynamic spatial processing originates in early visual pathways.
J. Neurosci.,
November 8, 2006;
26(45):
11763 - 11774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Teich and N. Qian
Comparison Among Some Models of Orientation Selectivity
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2006;
96(1):
404 - 419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-M. Alonso and H. A. Swadlow
Thalamocortical Specificity and the Synthesis of Sensory Cortical Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2005;
94(1):
26 - 32.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|