 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2003, 23(7):2920
Regulation of Spike Initiation and Propagation in an
Aplysia Sensory Neuron: Gating-In via Central
Depolarization
Colin G.
Evans1, 2,
Jian
Jing1,
Steven C.
Rosen3, and
Elizabeth C.
Cropper1
1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, 2 Phase Five
Communications Inc., New York, New York 10011, and 3 Center
for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York
10032
Afferent transmission can be regulated (or gated) so that responses
to peripheral stimuli are adjusted to make them appropriate for the
ongoing phase of a motor program. Here, we characterize a gating
mechanism that involves regulation of spike propagation in
Aplysia mechanoafferent B21. B21 is striking in that
afferent transmission to the motor neuron B8 does not occur when B21 is at resting membrane potential. Our data suggest that this results from
the fact that spikes are not actively propagated to the lateral process
of B21 (the primary contact with B8). When B21 is peripherally activated at its resting potential, electrotonic potentials in the
lateral process are on average 11 mV. In contrast, mechanoafferent activity is transmitted to B8 when B21 is centrally depolarized via current injection. Our data suggest that central depolarization relieves propagation failure. Full-size spikes are recorded in the
lateral process when B21 is depolarized and then peripherally activated. Moreover, changes in membrane potential in the lateral process affect spike amplitude, even when the somatic membrane potential is virtually unchanged. During motor programs, both the
lateral process and the soma of B21 are phasically depolarized via
synaptic input. These depolarizations are sufficient to convert subthreshold potentials to full-size spikes in the lateral process. Thus, our data strongly suggest that afferent transmission from B21 to
B8 is, at least in part, regulated via synaptic control of spike
initiation in the lateral process. Consequences of this control for
compartmentalization in B21 are discussed, as are specific consequences
for feeding behavior.
Key words:
sensorimotor integration; sensory gating; central
pattern generator; mollusc; feeding; motor program
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/03/2372920-12$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sasaki, V. Brezina, K. R. Weiss, and J. Jing
Distinct Inhibitory Neurons Exert Temporally Specific Control over Activity of a Motoneuron ReceivingConcurrent Excitation and Inhibition
J. Neurosci.,
September 23, 2009;
29(38):
11732 - 11744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ch. Ludwar, C. G. Evans, J. Jing, and E. C. Cropper
Two Distinct Mechanisms Mediate Potentiating Effects of Depolarization on Synaptic Transmission
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2009;
102(3):
1976 - 1983.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Evans, T. Kang, and E. C. Cropper
Selective Spike Propagation in the Central Processes of an Invertebrate Neuron
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2008;
100(5):
2940 - 2947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. B. S. Hedrich and W. Stein
Characterization of a descending pathway: activation and effects on motor patterns in the brachyuran crustacean stomatogastric nervous system
J. Exp. Biol.,
August 15, 2008;
211(16):
2624 - 2637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Beenhakker, M. S. Kirby, and M. P. Nusbaum
Mechanosensory Gating of Proprioceptor Input to Modulatory Projection Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
December 26, 2007;
27(52):
14308 - 14316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Evans, B. Ch. Ludwar, and E. C. Cropper
Mechanoafferent Neuron With An Inexcitable Somatic Region: Consequences for the Regulation of Spike Propagation and Afferent Transmission
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2007;
97(4):
3126 - 3130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Beenhakker, N. D. DeLong, S. R. Saideman, F. Nadim, and M. P. Nusbaum
Proprioceptor Regulation of Motor Circuit Activity by Presynaptic Inhibition of a Modulatory Projection Neuron
J. Neurosci.,
September 21, 2005;
25(38):
8794 - 8806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Evans, A. Romero, and E. C. Cropper
Inhibition of Afferent Transmission in the Feeding Circuitry of Aplysia: Persistence Can Be as Important as Size
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2005;
93(5):
2940 - 2949.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. S. Weragoda, E. Ferrer, and E. T. Walters
Memory-Like Alterations in Aplysia Axons after Nerve Injury or Localized Depolarization
J. Neurosci.,
November 17, 2004;
24(46):
10393 - 10401.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. Shetreat-Klein and E. C. Cropper
Afferent-Induced Changes in Rhythmic Motor Programs in the Feeding Circuitry of Aplysia
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2004;
92(4):
2312 - 2322.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Evans, J. Jing, A. Proekt, S. C. Rosen, and E. C. Cropper
Frequency-Dependent Regulation of Afferent Transmission in the Feeding Circuitry of Aplysia
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2003;
90(6):
3967 - 3977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|