QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (22) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baddeley, R. J. Articles by Miall, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baddeley, R. J. Articles by Miall, R. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2003, 23(7):3066

System Identification Applied to a Visuomotor Task: Near-Optimal Human Performance in a Noisy Changing Task

R. J. Baddeley¹, H. A. Ingram^{1, 2}, and R. C. Miall²

¹ Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, United Kingdom, and ² University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom

Sensory-motor integration has frequently been studied using a single-step change in a control variable such as prismatic lens angle and has revealed human visuomotor adaptation to often be partial and inefficient. We propose that the changes occurring in everyday life are better represented as the accumulation of many smaller perturbations contaminated by measurement noise. We have therefore tested human performance to random walk variations in the visual feedback of hand movements during a pointing task. Subjects made discrete targeted pointing movements to a visual target and received terminal feedback via a cursor the position of which was offset from the actual movement endpoint by a random walk element and a random observation element. By applying ideal observer analysis, which for this task compares human performance against that of a Kalman filter, we show that the subjects' performance was highly efficient with Fisher efficiencies reaching 73%. We then used system identification techniques to characterize the control strategy used. A "modified" delta-rule algorithm best modeled the human data, which suggests that they estimated the random walk perturbation of feedback in this task using an exponential weighting of recent errors. The time constant of the exponential weighting of the best-fitting model varied with the rate of random walk drift. Because human efficiency levels were high and did not vary greatly across three levels of observation noise, these results suggest that the algorithm the subjects used exponentially weighted recent errors with a weighting that varied with the level of drift in the task to maintain efficient performance.

Key words: visuomotor control; human; performance; movement; ideal observer analysis; system identification

---

Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/03/2373066-10$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. S. Huang and R. Shadmehr Persistence of Motor Memories Reflects Statistics of the Learning Event J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 931 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Munuera, P. Morel, J.-R. Duhamel, and S. Deneve Optimal Sensorimotor Control in Eye Movement Sequences J. Neurosci., March 11, 2009; 29(10): 3026 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Wei and K. Kording Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation? J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 655 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Seydell, B. C. McCann, J. Trommershauser, and D. C. Knill Learning Stochastic Reward Distributions in a Speeded Pointing Task J. Neurosci., April 23, 2008; 28(17): 4356 - 4367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Cheng and P. N. Sabes Calibration of Visually Guided Reaching Is Driven by Error-Corrective Learning and Internal Dynamics J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3057 - 3069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget Computational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 331 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chhabra and R. A. Jacobs Near-Optimal Human Adaptive Control across Different Noise Environments. J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10883 - 10887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Joiner and M. Shelhamer Responses to Noisy Periodic Stimuli Reveal Properties of a Neural Predictor J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 2121 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Fine and K. A. Thoroughman Motor Adaptation to Single Force Pulses: Sensitive to Direction but Insensitive to Within-Movement Pulse Placement and Magnitude J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 710 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Trommershauser, S. Gepshtein, L. T. Maloney, M. S. Landy, and M. S. Banks Optimal Compensation for Changes in Task-Relevant Movement Variability J. Neurosci., August 3, 2005; 25(31): 7169 - 7178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Crawford, W. P. Medendorp, and J. J. Marotta Spatial Transformations for Eye-Hand Coordination J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 10 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help