 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2003, 23(9):3561
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
A Physiological Correlate of the "Zoom Lens" of Visual AttentionNotger G. Müller1, Oliver A. Bartelt2, Tobias H. Donner2, Arno Villringer2, and Stephan A. Brandt2 1 Cognitive Neurology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany, and 2 Department of Neurology, Charité Medical School, Humboldt University, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Attending a certain region in space enhances activity in visual areas retinotopically mapped to this region; stimuli presented in this region are preferentially processed. The zoom lens model of visual attention proposes that the attended region can be adjusted in size and predicts a tradeoff between its size and processing efficiency because of limited processing capacities. By means of event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we analyzed neural activity in multiple visual areas as a function of the size of an attended visual field region, which was defined by a spatial cue stimulus. After cueing, a target object, defined by a specific feature conjunction, had to be identified among objects within the cued region. Neural activity preceding the objects in multiple retinotopic visual areas correlated with the size of the attended region, as did subjects' performance. While the extent of activated retinotopic visual cortex increased with the size of the attended region, the level of neural activity in a given subregion decreased. These findings are consistent with the physiological predictions of the zoom lens model. Size-related modulations of neural activity were pronounced in early visual areas. We relate this finding to the small receptive field of these areas, whereby only neuronal units with receptive fields covering the attended region received a top-down bias. This preactivation of neuronal units may then have gated selective processing of the features of the object that appeared at the attended location, thus enabling feature integration and object identification.
Key words: zoom lens; visuospatial attention; feature binding; retinotopy; receptive fields; fMRI
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/03/2393561-05$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
V. Romei, V. Brodbeck, C. Michel, A. Amedi, A. Pascual-Leone, and G. Thut
Spontaneous Fluctuations in Posterior {alpha}-Band EEG Activity Reflect Variability in Excitability of Human Visual Areas
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2010 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Q. Chen, J. C. Marshall, R. Weidner, and G. R. Fink
Zooming In and Zooming Out of the Attentional Focus: An fMRI Study
Cereb Cortex, August 9, 2008; (2008) bhn128v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. M. Sylvester, A. I. Jack, M. Corbetta, and G. L. Shulman
Anticipatory Suppression of Nonattended Locations in Visual Cortex Marks Target Location and Predicts Perception
J. Neurosci., June 25, 2008; 28(26): 6549 - 6556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. Egner, J. M. P. Monti, E. H. Trittschuh, C. A. Wieneke, J. Hirsch, and M.-M. Mesulam
Neural Integration of Top-Down Spatial and Feature-Based Information in Visual Search
J. Neurosci., June 11, 2008; 28(24): 6141 - 6151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Y. YESHURUN and M. CARRASCO
The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue
Percept Psychophys, January 1, 2008; 70(1): 104 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]
S. SHOMSTEIN and M. BEHRMANN
Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance
Percept Psychophys, January 1, 2008; 70(1): 132 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]
C. M. Sylvester, G. L. Shulman, A. I. Jack, and M. Corbetta
Asymmetry of Anticipatory Activity in Visual Cortex Predicts the Locus of Attention and Perception
J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14424 - 14433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. G. Muller and A. Kleinschmidt
Temporal dynamics of the attentional spotlight: neuronal correlates of attentional capture and inhibition of return in early visual cortex.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 587 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. A. Silver, D. Ress, and D. J. Heeger
Neural Correlates of Sustained Spatial Attention in Human Early Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 229 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. Baier, A. Kleinschmidt, and N. G. Muller
Cross-Modal Processing in Early Visual and Auditory Cortices depends on Expected Statistical Relationship of Multisensory Information.
J. Neurosci., November 22, 2006; 26(47): 12260 - 12265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. Shomstein and M. Behrmann
Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations
PNAS, July 25, 2006; 103(30): 11387 - 11392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. Compte and X.-J. Wang
Tuning Curve Shift by Attention Modulation in Cortical Neurons: a Computational Study of its Mechanisms
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 761 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. Busse and S. Katzner
The Time Course of Shifting Visual Attention
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 3885 - 3886.
[Full Text] [PDF]
S. A. McMains and D. C. Somers
Processing Efficiency of Divided Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9444 - 9448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. M. Greenwood, J. A. Fossella, and R. Parasuraman
Specificity of the Effect of a Nicotinic Receptor Polymorphism on Individual Differences in Visuospatial Attention
J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2005; 17(10): 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. G. Muller and A. Kleinschmidt
Dynamic Interaction of Object- and Space-Based Attention in Retinotopic Visual Areas
J. Neurosci., October 29, 2003; 23(30): 9812 - 9816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|