 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 26, 2004, 24(21):4989-4999; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4390-03.2004
Previous Article | Next Article 
Development/Plasticity/Repair
An Oligodendrocyte Lineage-Specific Semaphorin, Sema5A, Inhibits Axon Growth by Retinal Ganglion Cells
Jeffrey L. Goldberg,1,2 *
Mauricio E. Vargas,1 *
Jack T. Wang,1
Wim Mandemakers,1
Stephen F. Oster,3
David W. Sretavan,3 and
Ben A. Barres1
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Stanford, California 94305, 2Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California 95128, and 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
In the mammalian CNS, glial cells repel axons during development and inhibit axon regeneration after injury. It is unknown whether the same repulsive axon guidance molecules expressed by glia and their precursors during development also play a role in inhibiting regeneration in the injured CNS. Here we investigate whether optic nerve glial cells express semaphorin family members and, if so, whether these semaphorins inhibit axon growth by retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). We show that each optic nerve glial cell type, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and their precursor cells, expressed a distinct complement of semaphorins. One of these, sema5A, was expressed only by purified oligodendrocytes and their precursors, but not by astrocytes, and was present in both normal and axotomized optic nerve but not in peripheral nerves. Sema5A induced collapse of RGC growth cones and inhibited RGC axon growth when presented as a substrate in vitro. To determine whether sema5A might contribute to inhibition of axon growth after injury, we studied the ability of RGCs to extend axons when cultured on postnatal day (P) 4, P8, and adult optic nerve explants and found that axon growth was strongly inhibited. Blocking sema5A using a neutralizing antibody significantly increased RGC axon growth on these optic nerve explants. These data support the hypothesis that sema5A expression by oligodendrocyte lineage cells contributes to the glial cues that inhibit CNS regeneration.
Key words: regeneration; semaphorin; axon guidance; glia; axon growth; optic nerve
Received Sep 27, 2003;
revised April 16, 2004;
accepted April 17, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dill, H. Wang, F. Zhou, and S. Li
Inactivation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Promotes Axonal Growth and Recovery in the CNS
J. Neurosci.,
September 3, 2008;
28(36):
8914 - 8928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Fu, J. Hue, and S. Li
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Promote Axon Regeneration via RhoA Inhibition
J. Neurosci.,
April 11, 2007;
27(15):
4154 - 4164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Chalasani, A. Sabol, H. Xu, M. A. Gyda, K. Rasband, M. Granato, C.-B. Chien, and J. A. Raper
Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Antagonizes Slit/Robo Signaling In Vivo
J. Neurosci.,
January 31, 2007;
27(5):
973 - 980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Dimou, L. Schnell, L. Montani, C. Duncan, M. Simonen, R. Schneider, T. Liebscher, M. Gullo, and M. E. Schwab
Nogo-A-Deficient Mice Reveal Strain-Dependent Differences in Axonal Regeneration
J. Neurosci.,
May 24, 2006;
26(21):
5591 - 5603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fiore, B. Rahim, V. M. Christoffels, A. F. M. Moorman, and A. W. Puschel
Inactivation of the Sema5a Gene Results in Embryonic Lethality and Defective Remodeling of the Cranial Vascular System
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 15, 2005;
25(6):
2310 - 2319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. de Winter, Q. Cui, N. Symons, J. Verhaagen, and A. R. Harvey
Expression of Class-3 Semaphorins and Their Receptors in the Neonatal and Adult Rat Retina
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
December 1, 2004;
45(12):
4554 - 4562.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Fischer, V. Petkova, S. Thanos, and L. I. Benowitz
Switching Mature Retinal Ganglion Cells to a Robust Growth State In Vivo: Gene Expression and Synergy with RhoA Inactivation
J. Neurosci.,
October 6, 2004;
24(40):
8726 - 8740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|