 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 16, 2004, 24(24):5500-5505; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0219-04.2004
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Brain Mechanisms for Inferring Deceit in the Actions of Others
Julie Grèzes,1
Chris Frith,2 and
Richard E. Passingham2,3
1Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Collège de France, 75005 Paris, France, 2Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, and 3Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom
During social interactions, it is important to judge accurately whether a person is honest or deceitful. We often use nonverbal cues to infer whether others are trying to deceive us. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we studied subjects watching videos of actors lifting a box and judged whether or not the actors were trying to deceive them concerning the real weight of the box. When the subjects judged the actions as reflecting deceptive intention, there was activation of the amygdala and rostral anterior cingulate cortex. These areas were not activated when subjects made judgements about the beliefs rather than the intentions of others. We suggest that these activations reflect the observers' judgements of social intentions toward themselves and might reflect an emotional response to being deceived.
Key words: social perception; nonverbal behaviour; deceptive intention; amygdale; emotion; functional magnetic resonance imaging; fMRI
Received Jan 20, 2004;
revised April 26, 2004;
accepted April 30, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Steinbeis and S. Koelsch
Understanding the Intentions Behind Man-Made Products Elicits Neural Activity in Areas Dedicated to Mental State Attribution
Cereb Cortex,
March 1, 2009;
19(3):
619 - 623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Sebanz and M. Shiffrar
Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise
Psychon Bull Rev,
February 1, 2009;
16(1):
170 - 175.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Mason and C. N. Macrae
Perspective-Taking from a Social Neuroscience Standpoint
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2008;
11(2):
215 - 232.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Chaminade, J. Hodgins, and M. Kawato
Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci,
September 1, 2007;
2(3):
206 - 216.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. R. Olson, A. Plotzker, and Y. Ezzyat
The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing
Brain,
July 1, 2007;
130(7):
1718 - 1731.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Shamay-Tsoory, Y. Tibi-Elhanany, and J. Aharon-Peretz
The green-eyed monster and malicious joy: the neuroanatomical bases of envy and gloating (schadenfreude)
Brain,
June 1, 2007;
130(6):
1663 - 1678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Calvo-Merino, D.E. Glaser, J. Grezes, R.E. Passingham, and P. Haggard
Action Observation and Acquired Motor Skills: An fMRI Study with Expert Dancers
Cereb Cortex,
August 1, 2005;
15(8):
1243 - 1249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|