 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 16, 2004, 24(24):5560-5569; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0562-04.2004
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Improvements in the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Motor Cortex Cells Distinguish Early versus Late Phases of Motor Skill Learning
William J. Kargo andDouglas A. Nitz The Neurosciences Institute, San Diego, California 92121
There are numerous experience-driven changes in cortical circuitry that correlate with improved performance. Improved motor performance on a reach-to-grasp task in rodents is associated with changes in long-term potentiation (LTP), synaptogenesis, and movement representations in primary motor cortex (M1) by training days 3, 7, and 10, respectively. We recorded single-cell activity patterns in M1 during reach-to-grasp training to test how neural-spiking properties change with respect to LTP, synaptogenesis, and motor map changes. We also tested how neural-spiking changes relate directly to improved performance by monitoring muscle activity patterns. We found that signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of M1 spiking were significantly improved with practice but only after 7-12 d. Three sources of noise were assessed: signal-dependent noise exemplified by the slope of the relationship between mean spike count and count variance per burst, signal-independent noise exemplified by the offset of this relationship, and background firing rates before and after bursts. Signal-independent noise and pre-burst firing rates were reduced with practice. Early performance gains (days 1-6) were dissociated from SNR improvements, whereas later performance gains (day 7-12) were related directly to the magnitude of improvement in both muscle recruitment reliability and success rates. With training, an increased number of cells exhibited firing rates that were correlated with muscle recruitment patterns, with lags suggesting a primary direction of influence from M1 to muscles. These results suggest a functional linkage from local synaptogenesis in M1 to improved spiking reliability of M1 cells to more reliable recruitment of muscles and finally to improved behavioral performance.
Key words: motor learning; motor cortex; EMG; variability; plasticity; reliability
Received Feb 17, 2004; revised April 12, 2004; accepted May 3, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
M. H. Kao, B. D. Wright, and A. J. Doupe
Neurons in a Forebrain Nucleus Required for Vocal Plasticity Rapidly Switch between Precise Firing and Variable Bursting Depending on Social Context
J. Neurosci., December 3, 2008; 28(49): 13232 - 13247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. J. Kargo, B. Szatmary, and D. A. Nitz
Adaptation of Prefrontal Cortical Firing Patterns and Their Fidelity to Changes in Action-Reward Contingencies
J. Neurosci., March 28, 2007; 27(13): 3548 - 3559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. S. Desai and E. C. Walcott
Synaptic bombardment modulates muscarinic effects in forelimb motor cortex.
J. Neurosci., February 22, 2006; 26(8): 2215 - 2226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. E. Sergio, C. Hamel-Paquet, and J. F. Kalaska
Motor Cortex Neural Correlates of Output Kinematics and Kinetics During Isometric-Force and Arm-Reaching Tasks
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2353 - 2378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. S. Narayanan, E. Y. Kimchi, and M. Laubach
Redundancy and Synergy of Neuronal Ensembles in Motor Cortex
J. Neurosci., April 27, 2005; 25(17): 4207 - 4216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. D. Cohen and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Skilled Motor Learning Does Not Enhance Long-Term Depression in the Motor Cortex In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1486 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|