 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 30, 2004, 24(26):6037-6047; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1084-04.2004
Previous Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Intrinsic and Circuit Properties Favor Coincidence Detection for Decoding Oscillatory Input
Javier Perez-Orive,1
Maxim Bazhenov,2 and
Gilles Laurent1
1Computation and Neural Systems, Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, and 2The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037
In the insect olfactory system the antennal lobe generates oscillatory synchronization of its output as a framework for coincidence detection by its target, the mushroom body (MB). The intrinsic neurons of the MB (Kenyon cells, KCs) are thus a good model system in which to investigate the functional relevance of oscillations and neural synchronization. We combine electrophysiological and modeling approaches to examine how intrinsic and circuit properties might contribute to the preference of KCs for coincident input and how their decoding of olfactory information is affected by the absence of oscillatory synchronization in their input. We show that voltage-dependent subthreshold properties of KCs bring about a supralinear summation of their inputs, favoring responses to coincident EPSPs. Abolishing oscillatory synchronization weakens the preference of KCs for coincident input and causes a large reduction in their odor specificity. Finally, we find that a decoding strategy that is based on coincidence detection enhances both noise tolerance and input discriminability by KCs.
Key words: mushroom body; Kenyon cell; coincidence detection; oscillations; synchrony; coding
Received March 24, 2004;
revised May 18, 2004;
accepted May 18, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Paulk, J. Phillips-Portillo, A. M. Dacks, J.-M. Fellous, and W. Gronenberg
The Processing of Color, Motion, and Stimulus Timing Are Anatomically Segregated in the Bumblebee Brain
J. Neurosci.,
June 18, 2008;
28(25):
6319 - 6332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Doucette, J. Milder, and D. Restrepo
Adrenergic modulation of olfactory bulb circuitry affects odor discrimination
Learn. Mem.,
August 3, 2007;
14(8):
539 - 547.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Beshel, N. Kopell, and L. M. Kay
Olfactory Bulb Gamma Oscillations Are Enhanced with Task Demands
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 2007;
27(31):
8358 - 8365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Jortner, S. S. Farivar, and G. Laurent
A Simple Connectivity Scheme for Sparse Coding in an Olfactory System
J. Neurosci.,
February 14, 2007;
27(7):
1659 - 1669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kim, B. H. Singer, and M. Zochowski
Changing roles for temporal representation of odorant during the oscillatory response of the olfactory bulb.
Neural Comput.,
April 1, 2006;
18(4):
794 - 816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Lehmkuhle, R. A. Normann, and E. M. Maynard
Trial-by-Trial Discrimination of Three Enantiomer Pairs by Neural Ensembles in Mammalian Olfactory Bulb
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2006;
95(3):
1369 - 1379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Menzel and G. Manz
Neural plasticity of mushroom body-extrinsic neurons in the honeybee brain
J. Exp. Biol.,
November 15, 2005;
208(22):
4317 - 4332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Cleland and C. Linster
Computation in the Olfactory System
Chem Senses,
November 1, 2005;
30(9):
801 - 813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sivan and N. Kopell
From The Cover: Mechanism and circuitry for clustering and fine discrimination of odors in insects
PNAS,
December 21, 2004;
101(51):
17861 - 17866.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|