 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, July 14, 2004, 24(28):6237-6247; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1144-04.2004
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Functional Organization of Visual Cortex in the Owl Monkey
Xiangmin Xu,1
William Bosking,2
Gyula Sáry,3,4
James Stefansic,1
Daniel Shima,1 and
Vivien Casagrande1,3
1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2175, 2Division of Neuroscience and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2175, and 4Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary, H-6720
In this study, we compared the organization of orientation preference in visual areas V1, V2, and V3. Within these visual areas, we also quantified the relationship between orientation preference and cytochrome oxidase (CO) staining patterns. V1 maps of orientation preference contained both pinwheels and linear zones. The location of CO blobs did not relate in a systematic way to maps of orientation; although, as in other primates, there were approximately twice as many pinwheels as CO blobs. V2 contained bands of high and low orientation selectivity. The bands of high orientation selectivity were organized into pinwheels and linear zones, but iso-orientation domains were twice as large as those in V1. Quantitative comparisons between bands containing high or low orientation selectivity and CO dark and light bands suggested that at least four functional compartments exist in V2, CO dense bands with either high or low orientation selectivity, and CO light bands with either high or low selectivity. We also demonstrated that two functional compartments exist in V3, with zones of high orientation selectivity corresponding to CO dense areas and zones of low orientation selectivity corresponding to CO pale areas. Together with previous findings, these results suggest that the modular organization of V1 is similar across primates and indeed across most mammals. V2 organization in owl monkeys also appears similar to that of other simians but different from that of prosimians and other mammals. Finally, V3 of owl monkeys shows a compartmental organization for orientation selectivity that remains to be demonstrated in other primates.
Key words: optical imaging; owl monkey; striate cortex; extrastriate; cytochrome oxidase; orientation selectivity
Received Nov 22, 2003;
revised May 20, 2004;
accepted May 24, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Lu and A. W. Roe
Functional Organization of Color Domains in V1 and V2 of Macaque Monkey Revealed by Optical Imaging
Cereb Cortex,
March 1, 2008;
18(3):
516 - 533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Khaytin, X. Chen, D. W. Royal, O. Ruiz, W. J. Jermakowicz, R. M. Siegel, and V. A. Casagrande
Functional Organization of Temporal Frequency Selectivity in Primate Visual Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
December 3, 2007;
(2007)
bhm210v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Lu and A. W. Roe
Optical Imaging of Contrast Response in Macaque Monkey V1 and V2
Cereb Cortex,
November 1, 2007;
17(11):
2675 - 2695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Xu, C. E. Collins, I. Khaytin, J. H. Kaas, and V. A. Casagrande
Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area
PNAS,
November 14, 2006;
103(46):
17490 - 17495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Xu, W. H. Bosking, L. E. White, D. Fitzpatrick, and V. A. Casagrande
Functional Organization of Visual Cortex in the Prosimian Bush Baby Revealed by Optical Imaging of Intrinsic Signals
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2005;
94(4):
2748 - 2762.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Collins, X. Xu, I. Khaytin, P. M. Kaskan, V. A. Casagrande, and J. H. Kaas
Optical imaging of visually evoked responses in the middle temporal area after deactivation of primary visual cortex in adult primates
PNAS,
April 12, 2005;
102(15):
5594 - 5599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Polimeni, D. Granquist-Fraser, R. J. Wood, and E. L. Schwartz
Physical limits to spatial resolution of optical recording: Clarifying the spatial structure of cortical hypercolumns
PNAS,
March 15, 2005;
102(11):
4158 - 4163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Roe, H. D. Lu, and C. P. Hung
Cortical processing of a brightness illusion
PNAS,
March 8, 2005;
102(10):
3869 - 3874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shmuel, M. Korman, A. Sterkin, M. Harel, S. Ullman, R. Malach, and A. Grinvald
Retinotopic Axis Specificity and Selective Clustering of Feedback Projections from V2 to V1 in the Owl Monkey
J. Neurosci.,
February 23, 2005;
25(8):
2117 - 2131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|