 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 13, 2004, 24(41):9138-9145; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2025-04.2004
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Role of Cerebellar Interpositus Nucleus in the Genesis and Control of Reflex and Conditioned Eyelid Responses
Lydia Jiménez-Díaz, Juan de Dios Navarro-López, Agnès Gruart, andJosé M. Delgado-García División de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla-41013, Spain
The role of cerebellar circuits in the acquisition of new motor abilities is still a matter of intensive debate. To establish the contribution of posterior interpositus nucleus (PIN) to the performance and/or acquisition of reflex and classically conditioned responses (CRs) of the eyelid, the effects of microstimulation and/or pharmacological inhibition by muscimol of the nucleus were investigated in conscious cats. Microstimulation of the PIN in naive animals evoked ramp-like eyelid responses with a wavy appearance, without producing any noticeable plastic functional change in the cerebellar and brainstem circuits involved. Muscimol microinjections decreased the amplitude of reflex eyeblinks evoked by air puffs, both when presented alone or when paired with a tone as conditioned stimulus (CS). In half-conditioned animals, muscimol injections also decreased the amplitude and damped the typical wavy profile of CRs, whereas microstimulation of the same sites increased both parameters. However, neither muscimol injections nor microstimulation modified the expected percentage of CRs, suggesting a major role of the PIN in the performance of eyelid responses rather than in the learning process. Moreover, the simultaneous presentation of CS and microstimulation in well trained animals evoked CRs similar in amplitude to the added value of those evoked by the two stimuli presented separately. In contrast, muscimol-injected animals developed CRs to paired CS and microstimulation presentations, larger than those evoked by the two stimuli when presented alone. It is concluded that the PIN contributes to the enhancement of both reflex and conditioned eyelid responses and to the damping of resonant properties of neuromuscular elements controlling eyelid kinematics.
Key words: classical conditioning; cats; eyeblinks; interpositus nucleus; microstimulation; muscimol
Received May 26, 2004; revised July 26, 2004; accepted August 20, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
M. L. Molineux, W. H. Mehaffey, R. Tadayonnejad, D. Anderson, A. F. Tennent, and R. W. Turner
Ionic Factors Governing Rebound Burst Phenotype in Rat Deep Cerebellar Neurons
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2684 - 2701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. E. Andreescu, B. A. Milojkovic, E. D. Haasdijk, P. Kramer, F. H. De Jong, A. Krust, C. I. De Zeeuw, and M. T. G. De Jeu
Estradiol Improves Cerebellar Memory Formation by Activating Estrogen Receptor {beta}
J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10832 - 10839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. Leal-Campanario, A. Fairen, J. M. Delgado-Garcia, and A. Gruart
Electrical stimulation of the rostral medial prefrontal cortex in rabbits inhibits the expression of conditioned eyelid responses but not their acquisition
PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11459 - 11464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. Sanchez-Campusano, A. Gruart, and J. M. Delgado-Garcia
The Cerebellar Interpositus Nucleus and the Dynamic Control of Learned Motor Responses
J. Neurosci., June 20, 2007; 27(25): 6620 - 6632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
F.-P. Chen and C. Evinger
Cerebellar Modulation of Trigeminal Reflex Blinks: Interpositus Neurons
J. Neurosci., October 11, 2006; 26(41): 10569 - 10576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|