QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 13, 2004, 24(41):9201-9211; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2449-04.2004

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (28) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hsu, A. Articles by Theunissen, F. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hsu, A. Articles by Theunissen, F. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Modulation Power and Phase Spectrum of Natural Sounds Enhance Neural Encoding Performed by Single Auditory Neurons

Anne Hsu,^1,2 Sarah M. N. Woolley,^1,3 Thane E. Fremouw,^1,3 and Frédéric E. Theunissen^1,3

¹Neuroscience Institute and Departments of ²Physics and ³Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720

We examined the neural encoding of synthetic and natural sounds by single neurons in the auditory system of male zebra finches by estimating the mutual information in the time-varying mean firing rate of the neuronal response. Using a novel parametric method for estimating mutual information with limited data, we tested the hypothesis that song and song-like synthetic sounds would be preferentially encoded relative to other complex, but non-song-like synthetic sounds. To test this hypothesis, we designed two synthetic stimuli: synthetic songs that matched the power of spectral-temporal modulations but lacked the modulation phase structure of zebra finch song and noise with uniform band-limited spectral-temporal modulations. By defining neural selectivity as relative mutual information, we found that the auditory system of songbirds showed selectivity for song-like sounds. This selectivity increased in a hierarchical manner along ascending processing stages in the auditory system. Midbrain neurons responded with highest information rates and efficiency to synthetic songs and thus were selective for the spectral-temporal modulations of song. Primary forebrain neurons showed increased information to zebra finch song and synthetic song equally over noise stimuli. Secondary forebrain neurons responded with the highest information to zebra finch song relative to other stimuli and thus were selective for its specific modulation phase relationships. We also assessed the relative contribution of three response properties to this selectivity: (1) spiking reliability, (2) rate distribution entropy, and (3) bandwidth. We found that rate distribution and bandwidth but not reliability were responsible for the higher average information rates found for song-like sounds.

Key words: birdsong; field L; Mld; CM; information; complex sounds

---

Received June 21, 2004; revised August 31, 2004; accepted August 31, 2004.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. Tan and H. Yao The Spatiotemporal Frequency Tuning of LGN Receptive Field Facilitates Neural Discrimination of Natural Stimuli J. Neurosci., September 9, 2009; 29(36): 11409 - 11416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. N. Woolley, P. R. Gill, T. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen Functional Groups in the Avian Auditory System J. Neurosci., March 4, 2009; 29(9): 2780 - 2793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Norena, B. Gourevitch, M. Pienkowski, G. Shaw, and J. J. Eggermont Increasing Spectrotemporal Sound Density Reveals an Octave-Based Organization in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8885 - 8896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Gill, S. M. N. Woolley, T. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen What's That Sound? Auditory Area CLM Encodes Stimulus Surprise, Not Intensity or Intensity Changes J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2809 - 2820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Lesica and B. Grothe Dynamic Spectrotemporal Feature Selectivity in the Auditory Midbrain J. Neurosci., May 21, 2008; 28(21): 5412 - 5421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Boumans, C. Vignal, A. Smolders, J. Sijbers, M. Verhoye, J. Van Audekerke, N. Mathevon, and A. Van der Linden Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Zebra Finch Discerns the Neural Substrate Involved in Segregation of Conspecific Song From Background Noise J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 931 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. U. Voss, K. Tabelow, J. Polzehl, O. Tchernichovski, K. K. Maul, D. Salgado-Commissariat, D. Ballon, and S. A. Helekar Functional MRI of the zebra finch brain during song stimulation suggests a lateralized response topography PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10667 - 10672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Amin, A. Doupe, and F. E. Theunissen Development of Selectivity for Natural Sounds in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3517 - 3531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. B. Averbeck and L. M. Romanski Probabilistic Encoding of Vocalizations in Macaque Ventral Lateral Prefrontal Cortex J. Neurosci., October 25, 2006; 26(43): 11023 - 11033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Narayan, G. Grana, and K. Sen Distinct Time Scales in Cortical Discrimination of Natural Sounds in Songbirds J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. N. Woolley, P. R. Gill, and F. E. Theunissen Stimulus-Dependent Auditory Tuning Results in Synchronous Population Coding of Vocalizations in the Songbird Midbrain J. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 26(9): 2499 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Escabi, R. Nassiri, L. M. Miller, C. E. Schreiner, and H. L. Read The Contribution of Spike Threshold to Acoustic Feature Selectivity, Spike Information Content, and Information Throughput J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9524 - 9534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Narayan, A. Ergun, and K. Sen Delayed Inhibition in Cortical Receptive Fields and the Discrimination of Complex Stimuli J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2970 - 2975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help