WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 2004, 24(48):10941-10949; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3669-04.2004

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (45)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Woldorff, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Woldorff, M. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
The Neural Mechanisms for Minimizing Cross-Modal Distraction

D. H. Weissman, L. M. Warner, and M. G. Woldorff

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

The neural circuitry that increases attention to goal-relevant stimuli when we are in danger of becoming distracted is a matter of active debate. To address several long-standing controversies, we asked participants to identify a letter presented either visually or auditorily while we varied the amount of cross-modal distraction from an irrelevant letter in the opposite modality. Functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed three novel results. First, activity in sensory cortices that processed the relevant letter increased as the irrelevant letter became more distracting, consistent with a selective increase of attention to the relevant letter. In line with this view, an across-subjects correlation indicated that the larger the increase of activity in sensory cortices that processed the relevant letter, the less behavioral interference there was from the irrelevant letter. Second, regions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) involved in orienting attention to the relevant letter also participated in increasing attention to the relevant letter when conflicting stimuli were present. Third, we observed a novel pattern of regional specialization within the cognitive division of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) for focusing attention on the relevant letter (dorsal ACC) versus detecting conflict from the irrelevant letter (rostral ACC). These findings indicate novel roles for sensory cortices, the DLPFC, and the ACC in increasing attention to goal-relevant stimulus representations when distracting stimuli conflict with behavioral objectives. Furthermore, they potentially resolve a long-standing controversy regarding the key contribution of the ACC to cognitive control.

Key words: attention; conflict; sensory cortex; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; anterior cingulate cortex; multisensory


Received June 29, 2004; revised October 12, 2004; accepted October 20, 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
G. I. de Zubicaray and K. L. McMahon
Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, September 1, 2009; 9(3): 260 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Sadaghiani, J. X. Maier, and U. Noppeney
Natural, Metaphoric, and Linguistic Auditory Direction Signals Have Distinct Influences on Visual Motion Processing
J. Neurosci., May 20, 2009; 29(20): 6490 - 6499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A.R. Mayer, A.R. Franco, J. Canive, and D.L. Harrington
The Effects of Stimulus Modality and Frequency of Stimulus Presentation on Cross-modal Distraction
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2009; 19(5): 993 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. M. Orr and D. H. Weissman
Anterior Cingulate Cortex Makes 2 Contributions to Minimizing Distraction
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2009; 19(3): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Di Martino, A. Scheres, D.S. Margulies, A.M.C. Kelly, L.Q. Uddin, Z. Shehzad, B. Biswal, J.R. Walters, F.X. Castellanos, and M.P. Milham
Functional Connectivity of Human Striatum: A Resting State fMRI Study
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 2735 - 2747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Kayser, C. I. Petkov, and N. K. Logothetis
Visual Modulation of Neurons in Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1560 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. M. Ciaramitaro, G. T. Buracas, and G. M. Boynton
Spatial and Cross-Modal Attention Alter Responses to Unattended Sensory Information in Early Visual and Auditory Human Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2399 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Kayser, C. I. Petkov, M. Augath, and N. K. Logothetis
Functional Imaging Reveals Visual Modulation of Specific Fields in Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 1824 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Baier, A. Kleinschmidt, and N. G. Muller
Cross-Modal Processing in Early Visual and Auditory Cortices depends on Expected Statistical Relationship of Multisensory Information.
J. Neurosci., November 22, 2006; 26(47): 12260 - 12265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-