QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, December 8, 2004, 24(49):11023-11028; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3781-04.2004

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burwell, R. D. Articles by Jutras, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burwell, R. D. Articles by Jutras, M. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Perirhinal and Postrhinal Contributions to Remote Memory for Context

Rebecca D. Burwell, David J. Bucci, Matthew R. Sanborn, and Michael J. Jutras

Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912

The perirhinal (PER) and postrhinal (POR) cortices, two components of the medial temporal lobe memory system, are reciprocally connected with the hippocampus both directly and via the entorhinal cortex. Damage to PER or POR before or shortly after training on a contextual fear conditioning task causes deficits in the subsequent expression of contextual fear, implicating these regions in the acquisition or expression of contextual memory. Here, we examined the contribution of PER and POR to the processing of remotely learned contextual information. Male Long-Evans rats were trained in an unsignaled contextual fear conditioning paradigm. After training, rats received bilateral neurotoxic lesions to PER or POR or sham control surgeries at three different training-to-lesion intervals: 1, 28, or 100 d after training. Two weeks after surgery, lesioned and control rats were returned to the training context to assess contextual fear as measured by freezing. Rats with PER or POR damage froze significantly less in the training context than control rats but were not different from each other. The severity of the deficit did not differ across training-to-lesion intervals for any group. This pattern of deficits differs from that of posttraining hippocampal lesions, for which longer training-to-lesion intervals produce significantly more fear-conditioned contextual freezing than shorter training-to-lesion intervals. In the absence of such a retrograde gradient in the present study, our interpretation is that PER and POR have an ongoing role in the storage or retrieval of representations for context. Alternatively, these regions may be involved in a more extended consolidation process that becomes apparent beyond 100 d after learning.

Key words: fear conditioning; hippocampus; classical conditioning; memory; consolidation; parahippocampal

---

Received Sep 12, 2004; revised October 19, 2004; accepted October 25, 2004.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M.J. Ramos Perirhinal cortex lesions produce retrograde amnesia for spatial information in rats: Consolidation or retrieval? Learn. Mem., August 6, 2008; 15(8): 587 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Aminoff, N Gronau, and M Bar The Parahippocampal Cortex Mediates Spatial and Nonspatial Associations Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1493 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Seth and G. M. Edelman Distinguishing causal interactions in neural populations. Neural Comput., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 910 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help