 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 4, 2004, 24(5):1089-1100; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4445-03.2004
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds
Christian K. Machens, Michael S. Wehr, andAnthony M. Zador Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724
How do cortical neurons represent the acoustic environment? This question is often addressed by probing with simple stimuli such as clicks or tone pips. Such stimuli have the advantage of yielding easily interpreted answers, but have the disadvantage that they may fail to uncover complex or higher-order neuronal response properties. Here, we adopt an alternative approach, probing neuronal responses with complex acoustic stimuli, including animal vocalizations. We used in vivo whole-cell methods in the rat auditory cortex to record subthreshold membrane potential fluctuations elicited by these stimuli. Most neurons responded robustly and reliably to the complex stimuli in our ensemble. Using regularization techniques, we estimated the linear component, the spectrotemporal receptive field (STRF), of the transformation from the sound (as represented by its time-varying spectrogram) to the membrane potential of the neuron. We find that the STRF has a rich dynamical structure, including excitatory regions positioned in general accord with the prediction of the classical tuning curve. However, whereas the STRF successfully predicts the responses to some of the natural stimuli, it surprisingly fails completely to predict the responses to others; on average, only 11% of the response power could be predicted by the STRF. Therefore, most of the response of the neuron cannot be predicted by the linear component, although the response is deterministically related to the stimulus. Analysis of the systematic errors of the STRF model shows that this failure cannot be attributed to simple nonlinearities such as adaptation to mean intensity, rectification, or saturation. Rather, the highly nonlinear response properties of auditory cortical neurons must be attributable to nonlinear interactions between sound frequencies and time-varying properties of the neural encoder.
Key words: natural stimuli; auditory cortex; whole cell; patch clamp; reverse correlation; neural code
Received Sep 30, 2003; revised November 18, 2003; accepted November 18, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:
D. Gans, K. Sheykholeslami, D. C. Peterson, and J. Wenstrup
Temporal Features of Spectral Integration in the Inferior Colliculus: Effects of Stimulus Duration and Rise Time
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 167 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. Pienkowski, G. Shaw, and J. J. Eggermont
Wiener-Volterra Characterization of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex Using Poisson-Distributed Impulse Train Inputs
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3031 - 3041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. C. Sincich, J. C. Horton, and T. O. Sharpee
Preserving Information in Neural Transmission
J. Neurosci., May 13, 2009; 29(19): 6207 - 6216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. Hawkins, D. George, and J. Niemasik
Sequence memory for prediction, inference and behaviour
Phil Trans R Soc B, May 12, 2009; 364(1521): 1203 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. V. David, N. Mesgarani, J. B. Fritz, and S. A. Shamma
Rapid Synaptic Depression Explains Nonlinear Modulation of Spectro-Temporal Tuning in Primary Auditory Cortex by Natural Stimuli
J. Neurosci., March 18, 2009; 29(11): 3374 - 3386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. Huetz, B. Philibert, and J.-M. Edeline
A Spike-Timing Code for Discriminating Conspecific Vocalizations in the Thalamocortical System of Anesthetized and Awake Guinea Pigs
J. Neurosci., January 14, 2009; 29(2): 334 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. Gill, S. M. N. Woolley, T. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen
What's That Sound? Auditory Area CLM Encodes Stimulus Surprise, Not Intensity or Intensity Changes
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2809 - 2820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. A. Lesica and B. Grothe
Dynamic Spectrotemporal Feature Selectivity in the Auditory Midbrain
J. Neurosci., May 21, 2008; 28(21): 5412 - 5421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. O. Sharpee, K. D. Miller, and M. P. Stryker
On the Importance of Static Nonlinearity in Estimating Spatiotemporal Neural Filters With Natural Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2496 - 2509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. D Young
Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech
Phil Trans R Soc B, March 12, 2008; 363(1493): 923 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. B. Ahrens, J. F. Linden, and M. Sahani
Nonlinearities and Contextual Influences in Auditory Cortical Responses Modeled with Multilinear Spectrotemporal Methods
J. Neurosci., February 20, 2008; 28(8): 1929 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
G. B. Christianson, M. Sahani, and J. F. Linden
The Consequences of Response Nonlinearities for Interpretation of Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields
J. Neurosci., January 9, 2008; 28(2): 446 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. Bandyopadhyay, L. A. J. Reiss, and E. D. Young
Receptive Field for Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons at Multiple Sound Levels
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3505 - 3515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. A. J. Reiss, S. Bandyopadhyay, and E. D. Young
Effects of Stimulus Spectral Contrast on Receptive Fields of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2133 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. Elhilali, J. B. Fritz, T.-S. Chi, and S. A. Shamma
Auditory Cortical Receptive Fields: Stable Entities with Plastic Abilities
J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10372 - 10382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Y. E. Cohen, F. Theunissen, B. E. Russ, and P. Gill
Acoustic Features of Rhesus Vocalizations and Their Representation in the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1470 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. Wang, R. Narayan, G. Grana, M. Shamir, and K. Sen
Cortical Discrimination of Complex Natural Stimuli: Can Single Neurons Match Behavior?
J. Neurosci., January 17, 2007; 27(3): 582 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. B. Averbeck and L. M. Romanski
Probabilistic Encoding of Vocalizations in Macaque Ventral Lateral Prefrontal Cortex
J. Neurosci., October 25, 2006; 26(43): 11023 - 11033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. V. M. Herz, T. Gollisch, C. K. Machens, and D. Jaeger
Modeling single-neuron dynamics and computations: a balance of detail and abstraction.
Science, October 6, 2006; 314(5796): 80 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. J. Plack, A. J. Oxenham, and V. Drga
Masking by Inaudible Sounds and the Linearity of Temporal Summation.
J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8767 - 8773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
H. Asari, B. A. Pearlmutter, and A. M. Zador
Sparse representations for the cocktail party problem.
J. Neurosci., July 12, 2006; 26(28): 7477 - 7490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini
The statistical computation underlying contrast gain control.
J. Neurosci., June 7, 2006; 26(23): 6346 - 6353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. A. A. Campbell, J. W. H. Schnupp, A. Shial, and A. J. King
Binaural-Level Functions in Ferret Auditory Cortex: Evidence for a Continuous Distribution of Response Properties
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3742 - 3755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. N. O'Connor, C. I. Petkov, and M. L. Sutter
Adaptive Stimulus Optimization for Auditory Cortical Neurons
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4051 - 4067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. D. Young and B. M. Calhoun
Nonlinear Modeling of Auditory-Nerve Rate Responses to Wideband Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4441 - 4454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. A. Escabi, R. Nassiri, L. M. Miller, C. E. Schreiner, and H. L. Read
The Contribution of Spike Threshold to Acoustic Feature Selectivity, Spike Information Content, and Information Throughput
J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9524 - 9534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. Narayan, A. Ergun, and K. Sen
Delayed Inhibition in Cortical Receptive Fields and the Discrimination of Complex Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2970 - 2975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. Las, E. A. Stern, and I. Nelken
Representation of Tone in Fluctuating Maskers in the Ascending Auditory System
J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1503 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. R. Deweese and A. M. Zador
Shared and Private Variability in the Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1840 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. V. David, W. E. Vinje, and J. L. Gallant
Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons
J. Neurosci., August 4, 2004; 24(31): 6991 - 7006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|